Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tally of Everyone Who Believed in Rhule


PantherNation123
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was hopeful but the more I see this team so unprepared week in and week out, I start questioning what it is that they do in "practice" every week. They attend the games on Sundays and just look so lost, in addition to playing with no tenacity whatsoever. We need to hit the reset button and I hope it happens sooner rather than later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol you’re not going to get a tally or any kind of accountability from those people. I honestly have no idea why people were so big on Rhule even until recent times. He had a lot of question marks coming here and they showed up more and more as time went on. Of course, the excitement of moving on from Rivera helped with those initial concerns. I hated Rivera and still do but the fact is both are terrible coaches. Rivera just got lucky with Cam Newton and having McDermott.

It happens, the dude is a terrible coach. Many others have failed horribly as well. No reason it should have lasted this long but it did. Just poor management.  Hopefully the next HC will be a much better prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never wanted him.  Always thought he had that sleazeball, used car salesman vibe about him...  then after we hired him, I hoped for the best even though I hated it, and even started believing in him after seeing some of his opening pressers as he seemed smart and charismatic.  Then he actually coached, and I realized why I never wanted him again in the first place, because all that talk is empty if you don't have the ability as a strategist and game manager to back it up.

And now when he talks, it means nothing.  

So in summary, never wanted him, and still don't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I told you so thread.. When most ppl here wanted him fired last year... This happy poo when this team is losing and you're supposed to be fan??? Nobody feel good clown!!

Not sure what’s happy about this thread buddy.  But absolutely I want to “I told you so”…. Been some crazy Rhule love here for a while. Let’s not forget he never beat a top 25 team in COLLEGE.  Alas, beating a dead horse though, so my bad for asking who supported him.  Still want to know though

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...