Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule currently sits as the 13th worst coach in league history (35 gm min., since 1966)


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Baker only had two sacks yesterday. Granted, I'd like zero, but it's not like he getting pounded into the turf frequently.

Its 6 through 2 games and he was under constant duress all game.  Some of his scrambles he barely avoided geting obliterated and on one (maybe 2) he tried that little stutter step by the sidelines and almost got caught.  He is not athletic enough to be doing that.  My point however whatever chance we have to win is through baker and if he gets hurt game over.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its 6 through 2 games and he was under constant duress all game.  Some of his scrambles he barely avoided geting obliterated and on one (maybe 2) he tried that little stutter step by the sidelines and almost got caught.  He is not athletic enough to be doing that.  My point however whatever chance we have to win is through baker and if he gets hurt game over.

Yup, 4 in the opener and 2 yesterday.  That's an improvement game over game.  Remember, these guys are not gelled yet because of 'open camp competitions' and all.  If they stay at 2 or less sacks a game, then the O-line will be improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Baker only had two sacks yesterday. Granted, I'd like zero, but it's not like he getting pounded into the turf frequently.

He also had to throw it away 3 times because he ran at the pass rush and into the sideline.  I'm not sure if it's the play call that takes too long for the wr's to get open, he's impatient or just can't see over the oline. Whatever it is it all stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

He's bad man. It's not Baker, it's not Sam, it's Rhule. Point, blank, period. We hired a guy who turned around Temple and Baylor, and the team who wanted him other than us just BEAT Rhule with a first year head coach. 

So way to go Tepper.

 

I knew what was gonna happen to close out the Giants game when Sean Payton was on at halftime talking in the past tense of the Giants victory with complete, total, and warranted disrespect of Rhule as the motivating factor. The Giants did exactly what Payton predicted they would do too.

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...