Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winston playing with fractured vertebraes


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Snake said:

NO hung with Tampa till they got into that fight and lost their best CB. We are no were near the talent of TB. We're going to get throttled by NO and their defense. 

This is what I think

and, if they didn’t stop Jones, they will have fits with hill and always have 

when you don’t have LBs and can’t hold sn edge, well

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol remember... was it last year or the year before where they literally had no receivers?  They had to promote multiple guys off the PS and people here were all giddy going in thinking that was an automatic dub and they came out and whooped our ass like they just lined up three prime Colstons.  That poo never matters.  They're still gonna whoop our ass.  Difference is, I want them to this time...  put the nail in the Rhule coffin.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug that. All aboard the tank train. Why win 4 games and get fuged out of a top 5 pick? Hell we need number 1 for the new coaching staff. 

most of this team and staff are utter trash and while I don’t think they’ll win even trying I don’t want any dumbass moral wins vs injured players and/or their back ups

you ‘never tank!’ crowd had your super bowl vs the Saints third stringers several years ago that fuged us out of a top pick and been ass ever since, go watch those reruns and celebrate

It’s time to let us have the proper tank and actually look forward to at the very least hope of a future

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Barkley still managed to hammer us when it counted the most.

We pretty well sold out to stop the run. Guessing we probably didn't think Jones could beat us passing, but he did.

Disagree.

Any time you defense gives up 19 points, you gotta expect your offense to keep you above water.  At 19 points per game, our defense would have ranked fourth in scoring defense last year.  I don't hold much to yardage defense, but scoring defense is a stat that matter.

Likewise, on offense, scoring fewer than 19 points would have made you one of the bottom 7 teams in the league.

I feel like our defense did fine, and our offense crapped the bed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Disagree.

Any time you defense gives up 19 points, you gotta expect your offense to keep you above water.  At 19 points per game, our defense would have ranked fourth in scoring defense last year.  I don't hold much to yardage defense, but scoring defense is a stat that matter.

Likewise, on offense, scoring fewer than 19 points would have made you one of the bottom 7 teams in the league.

I feel like our defense did fine, and our offense crapped the bed.

 

Not when we needed to hold them and get the ball back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Barkley still managed to hammer us when it counted the most.

We pretty well sold out to stop the run. Guessing we probably didn't think Jones could beat us passing, but he did.

I wouldn't go that far. Daniel Jones averaged 5.2 yards per attempt on 34 passes; that's bad by any metric. Barkley averaged 3.4 yards per carry; his longest carry was 16 yards and a player like him running 21 times and expecting him to not have a single decent run is not realistic. We gave up 19 points despite turning it over twice in our own territory. Hard to be too critical of the defense here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...