Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Are the Panthers becoming perennial Losers?”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

But he didn’t get involved with the team decisions until Rhule got here. Even tepper isn’t the source of our losing. He is just the person who owns the losers.

Tepper said he was staying out of football operations as he focused on the business side of the house his first year. Going into the second year he talked a big game about how he was now going to be putting his stamp on the football side of the house. Well, his first year was our best (bad) year on the field under his ownership. Since he put his stamp on the football side of the house it has been shown that "stamp" is actually the mushroom stamp other teams have been slapping on our face on the field ever since.

Funny thing is that Tepper doesn't talk so much these days. He really wanted to strut around and try to be the face of this organization when he first took over. He pretty much just hides these days. It seems like he's embarrassed of what he's created and he damn well should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Tepper said he was staying out of football operations as he focused on the business side of the house his first year. Going into the second year he talked a big game about how he was now going to be putting his stamp on the football side of the house. Well, his first year was our best (bad) year on the field under his ownership. Since he put his stamp on the football side of the house it has been shown that "stamp" is actually the mushroom stamp other teams have been slapping on our face on the field ever since.

Funny thing is that Tepper doesn't talk so much these days. He really wanted to strut around and try to be the face of this organization when he first took over. He pretty much just hides these days. It seems like he's embarrassed of what he's created and he damn well should be.

Wasn’t Kyle Allen our starting qb tepper’s first year of active ownership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

But he didn’t get involved with the team decisions until Rhule got here. Even tepper isn’t the source of our losing. He is just the person who owns the losers.

Wasn’t there a big thing where he was the one to make Rivera switch to a 3-4 D because that’s what Pittsburgh was running?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Not 'becoming', but 'are'.

It's a culture now. That's why you've got guys like RA saying that fans shouldn't be so negative. He's ok with it so we should be.

Nah, his underlying demeanor, including his outburst on the sidelines last season, belies the fact that he's not OK with it. He was very hopeful and optimistic that Mayfield would magically help to turn things around--including the culture, but we've sucked for the first couple of games and Robbie is frustrated like everyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Yep. That’s why we drafted Burns. We were still running hybrid 3-4 prior to that year under Rivera. We just went into the draft with that mindset. 

Rivera talked about running a 3-4 but I never saw any actual change in his defensive concepts. We just got lighter on the edges and essentially ran a 4-3 D with 3-4 personnel on the edges.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think people give too much blame/credit when it comes to owners. At the end of the day owners don’t possess this 6th sense and know exactly what potential new head coaches are going to be the next Vince Lombardi or the next.. well the next Rhule.

Its not an owner who builds a team, signs and picks Free Agents, drafts and scouts players, coaches players to be their best, manage and coach in game situations, call plays etc etc.

An owner is only as good as the GM/Scouts/Head Coaches/players/coaching staff etc. 

Tepper hasn’t really done anything different than other owners have done, it just so happened the head coach he hired didn’t pan out, it happens, on to the next one. I just can’t pinpoint a “smoking gun” to point to and say Tepper has been a bad owner. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...