Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Are the Panthers becoming perennial Losers?”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Yep. That’s why we drafted Burns. We were still running hybrid 3-4 prior to that year under Rivera. We just went into the draft with that mindset. 

What’s funny is Pittsburgh has some close stats the past 2 years for their D close to the our D the last 2 years under Ron.

Sacks for days but can’t stop the run being the main one.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, panthersgreenville said:

Honestly, I think people give too much blame/credit when it comes to owners. At the end of the day owners don’t possess this 6th sense and know exactly what potential new head coaches are going to be the next Vince Lombardi or the next.. well the next Rhule.

Its not an owner who builds a team, signs and picks Free Agents, drafts and scouts players, coaches players to be their best, manage and coach in game situations, call plays etc etc.

An owner is only as good as the GM/Scouts/Head Coaches/players/coaching staff etc. 

Tepper hasn’t really done anything different than other owners have done, it just so happened the head coach he hired didn’t pan out, it happens, on to the next one. I just can’t pinpoint a “smoking gun” to point to and say Tepper has been a bad owner. 

The owner hires the people that build the team.  So he isn’t a non-factor. 

and clearly Tepper has done things other owners haven’t done.  He made a middle of the road college coach one of the highest paid coaches in the NFL, gave him absurd power and let him bring a nearly all college staff with him to the pros.   That’s not par for the course for NFL ownership.  That makes Tepper on the unique side.   And not in a good way 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, panthersgreenville said:

Honestly, I think people give too much blame/credit when it comes to owners. At the end of the day owners don’t possess this 6th sense and know exactly what potential new head coaches are going to be the next Vince Lombardi or the next.. well the next Rhule.

Its not an owner who builds a team, signs and picks Free Agents, drafts and scouts players, coaches players to be their best, manage and coach in game situations, call plays etc etc.

An owner is only as good as the GM/Scouts/Head Coaches/players/coaching staff etc. 

Tepper hasn’t really done anything different than other owners have done, it just so happened the head coach he hired didn’t pan out, it happens, on to the next one. I just can’t pinpoint a “smoking gun” to point to and say Tepper has been a bad owner. 

Owners pick the guys who do those things.

And this is where Tepper has been a problem. He's trusted the wrong people.

He trusted Hurney first. That led to Rhule, whom he trusted with a huge contract and full control.

Trusting the wrong people is the Cardinal Sin for an NFL owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Owners pick the guys who do those things.

And this is where Tepper has been a problem. He's trusted the wrong people.

He trusted Hurney first. That led to Rhule, whom he trusted with a huge contract and full control.

Trusting the wrong people is the Cardinal Sin for an NFL owner.

He let a bullshit artist hire a bullshit artist and we the fans are left with

 

 

200 (1).gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Nah, his underlying demeanor, including his outburst on the sidelines last season, belies the fact that he's not OK with it. He was very hopeful and optimistic that Mayfield would magically help to turn things around--including the culture, but we've sucked for the first couple of games and Robbie is frustrated like everyone else. 

Robbie is also the world's biggest Matt Rhule fan.

He may be upset with the losing but he's failing to recognize where it's really coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We had just hit north of .500 all time in 2018 and then Cam took that hit in the shoulder…that’s the mark when things went downhill.

We can't blame the loss of Cam for the failure to properly replace him though.

And let's be real: He wasn't gonna last forever, especially not with the style of football he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Not 'becoming', but 'are'.

It's a culture now. That's why you've got guys like RA saying that fans shouldn't be so negative. He's ok with it so we should be.

I ignore comments like that only because they know what a crowd can do for the team they’re cheering for and in most cases cheering against.

He put no more effort into that thought than he did securing the football.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We can't blame the loss of Cam for the failure to properly replace him though.

And let's be real: He wasn't gonna last forever, especially not with the style of football he played.

Not Cam’s fault at all, it’s was on Hurney and Rivera not realizing the end was coming sooner rather than later.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...