Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Being Honest, Rhule isn’t the issue


Doc Holiday
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

You were happy to post the fact, maybe you should, oh I don't know, own up to it.

 

lol @LinvilleGorge posts that the panthers only have 54 and it's the 4th quarter. Gets proven wrong and spins and deflects rather than take responsibility for being wrong. 

 

Nice work when you can get it.

You pissed me off so I went through the play by play. The first 3 quarters play by play of all passing plays:

Sack -3

Incomplete

Incomplete

Incomplete

9 to Thomas

-2 to Smith

14 to Anderson

Incomplete

2 to Moore

Incomplete

Sack -9

15 to Ricci

Incomplete

-1 to CMC

7 to Tremble

Sack -10

Incomplete

Incomplete

8 to CMC

24 to Smith

Incomplete

Incomplete

That's 9/19 for 76 yards and 3 sacks for 22 yards for a net of... 

drumroll-please-clark-griswold.gif

54 passing yards in the 4th quarter. We exceeded 54 passing yards with 11:19 left in the 4th quarter.

Suck on that douchebag. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The leaning on the D to bail out the offense is the reason we are 1-2 and the reason we will keep losing winnable games. I have seen nothing thus far to give even an inkling of changes have been made. Shenault looked amazing in his debut, but other than that the offense looked flat like it has this far. We have way too much talent to look like this on Offense and if we can be honest with ourselves the defense isn't anywhere close to being a top 10 unit.

 

 

TLDR: Offense still sucks, defense is mid new coaches same same. Rhule is the ultimate problem by refusing to evolve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You pissed me off so I went through the play by play. The first 3 quarters play by play of all passing plays:

Sack -3

Incomplete

Incomplete

Incomplete

9 to Thomas

-2 to Smith

14 to Anderson

Incomplete

2 to Moore

Incomplete

Sack -9

15 to Ricci

Incomplete

-1 to CMC

7 to Tremble

Sack -10

Incomplete

Incomplete

8 to CMC

24 to Smith

Incomplete

Incomplete

That's 9/19 for 76 yards and 3 sacks for 22 yards for a net of... 

drumroll-please-clark-griswold.gif

54 passing yards in the 4th quarter. We exceeded 54 passing yards with 11:19 left in the 4th quarter.

Suck on that douchebag. 

 

Dudes just got to be a troll. You’re not a Franchise QB in the NFL if all you can manage is 54 yards heading into the 4th Quarter. Baker isn’t the answer.

lol @ everyone saying I’m wrong when we pretty much got nothing out of Baker for 95% of the game. Don’t care who the coach is with QB play that abysmal the coach doesn’t matter.

again with all that said, Rhule has his issues, he just isn’t the biggest issue with the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Dudes just got to be a troll. You’re not a Franchise QB in the NFL if all you can manage is 54 yards heading into the 4th Quarter. Baker isn’t the answer.

lol @ everyone saying I’m wrong when we pretty much got nothing out of Baker for 95% of the game. Don’t care who the coach is with QB play that abysmal the coach doesn’t matter.

again with all that said, Rhule has his issues, he just isn’t the biggest issue with the team. 

If Rhule just had "issues" it'd be one thing.

He's unqualified, not smart enough and frankly terrible.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If Rhule just had "issues" it'd be one thing.

He's unqualified, not smart enough and frankly terrible.

I’m not gonna argue that, I don’t like Rhule either and want him gone. I just don’t think coach is the biggest issue or we are suddenly gonna become a playoff team with a coaching change at this point. That’s all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc Holiday said:

I’m not gonna argue that, I don’t like Rhule either and want him gone. I just don’t think coach is the biggest issue or we are suddenly gonna become a playoff team with a coaching change at this point. That’s all.

I don't know that anyone's arguing that.

The only real question is whether Rhule deserves to be fired or not.

I think it's pretty clear he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, firstdayfan said:

Dude watch other NFL games besides the Panthers, look at what a quality coach can do for teams/players. Look at Miami, Philly, Jacksonville to name a few. 

Rhule is the problem, we've had multiple QBs start for this team during his tenure, including Cam and they have ALL looked terrible. 

All those teams have franchise QB’s. (In Jags case, potentially)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...