Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember, we only lose that conditional 5th rounder if Baker plays over 70% snaps this year..


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

I think he gets two more games. I doubt they trot Darnold out there right off the injury. 
 

Mayfield is gonna get abused by these next two defense and then is gonna turn the reins over to Darnold. 
 

What a colossal disaster. 

Probably. And then Darnold comes in and the results will look pretty much the same except with more fumbles.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wire GIF

If Sam is starting again we are competing for the 1st overall pick. We should start looking to pick up draft capital now. Trade Baker and play PJ while making Sam hold the clipboard. IDGAF about any of them, it is time to do what is best for the next crew.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Let's be honest though. It's very obvious now why the Browns had to eat most of his salary just to move him for a conditional 5th round pick. That's almost certainly what the Jets would've had to do with Darnold too if we weren't so dumb and desperate.

The Jets didn't have to trade Darnold - they hadn't activated the last year of his contract with the guaranteed money.

 

I'm sure they'd have been as happy with him sitting on the bench backing up Wilson if it came to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Wait, I thought Fitt stole Baker from the browns

😂😂😂

In hindsight I still think that was a good trade at the time. Especially knowing they'd normally give up a 2nd, and two 3rds for nothing.  I guess they're just lucky they'd traded too much for Darnold already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to ask myself if every last one of our QB's the past few years are that terrible or is the coaching just this pathetic? Yes all our QB's past few seasons have struggled but I feel like coaching is playing a huge part in it also. Oke of these guys we have had the past few seasons is going to go somewhere else and maybe not be a hall of fame player but they will establish themselves as a good solid player and we are going to be scratching our heads wondering why they didn't show that here. My only answer will be that our coaching was just that bad I guess...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...