Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ken Dorsey


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Everyone wanted him canned as a qb coach here and now he's all the rage for head coach? I don't get it.

Look at what he did with Cam, Look at what he's done with Josh Allen, now Look at what he's done with the entire Bill's offense. Almost every team having success right now has a young, offensive minded coach, or an existing one like Andy Reid. 

Give me Dorsey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Natural said:

Lmao you people kill me. In his time here he was continuously poo on as being a terrible QB coach who was detrimental to the development of Cam Newton. Now he's all of a sudden a great HC candidate?

He was detrimental to Cam? How? Mike Shula was the issue here. Dorsey's time with Josh Allen has proved that.

Allen went from a 52% completion in college to nearly 70% in the NFL and the front runner of the MVP race. The Bill's are scoring what seems like 40 points per game right now. 

His time here with Cam was not indicative of him. It was probably more of an indictment on Cam and Shula than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

He was detrimental to Cam? How? Mike Shula was the issue here. Dorsey's time with Josh Allen has proved that.

Allen went from a 52% completion in college to nearly 70% in the NFL and the front runner of the MVP race. The Bill's are scoring what seems like 40 points per game right now. 

His time here with Cam was not indicative of him. It was probably more of an indictment on Cam and Shula than anything.

I'm not saying he was or wasn't... I'm merely stating what the popular opinion here at the time was. Ken Dorsey is playing with a ridiculously stacked team so it's hard to say how much is playcalling rather than just having superior talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...