Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snow


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Everyone will be let go at the end of the season like what happened to the Raiders last year. 

Ya, I really want Snow gone though. Yesterday. Wilkes can manage the D. I know everyone says our D is great and they aren’t the problem.
 

But they really are not great. Ya they make a couple big plays, a couple flashes but it’s the same thing it’s been since Rhule & Snow took over. The zones are poo, they get run over in the second halves of games on a weekly basis, they use players in ways the players themselves call out, the defense has no concrete identity, etc. 
 

Wilkes needs to be an absolute control of the defense for here on out. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Ya, I really want Snow gone though. Yesterday. Wilkes can manage the D. I know everyone says our D is great and they aren’t the problem.
 

But they really are not great. Ya they make a couple big plays, a couple flashes but it’s the same thing it’s been since Rhule & Snow took over. The zones are poo, they get run over in the second halves of games on a weekly basis, they use players in ways the players themselves call out, the defense has no concrete identity, etc. 
 

Wilkes needs to be an absolute control of the defense for here on out. 

Wilks was under Snow now he's over him.  I see Snow having a big problem with Wilks. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ya, I really want Snow gone though. Yesterday. Wilkes can manage the D. I know everyone says our D is great and they aren’t the problem.
 

But they really are not great. Ya they make a couple big plays, a couple flashes but it’s the same thing it’s been since Rhule & Snow took over. The zones are poo, they get run over in the second halves of games on a weekly basis, they use players in ways the players themselves call out, the defense has no concrete identity, etc. 
 

Wilkes needs to be an absolute control of the defense for here on out. 

They are literally on the field for 40 minutes out of an hour every game, you trippin.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...