Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next step: Get rid of Robby Anderson


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Please. 

Get rid of every single "Rhule guy" by next year. He brainwashed too many of these dudes into thinking losing is okay and part of a process. Need to get guys like TMJ and Shi those reps and see if they have it or not. 

 

IMO, TMJ and Shi these last two weeks, with limited snaps, have shown some flashes of being steady and contributing if given opportunity.

 

Of course, the top three targets are Robby, CMC, and DJ. Need PJ to spread the wealth, see what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Trade him for whatever, cut him, just get rid of him.

His contract is terrible. He's 10% of the cap next season, and I think we can all agree we don't want him on the team next year. It's going to hurt no matter when we do it. 

He has a terrible attitude. I'm sick of watching him mope, hearing him pout, miss blocks, round off his routes. Yeah, it's a poo situation, but CMC and DJ are still going out there and busting their ass. Plus, I'd rather see Terrace and Shi. 

He's not going to be in the team's long term plans. I think we can all agree on this.

He probably has the most inexcusable "Rhule's guy" contract, even worse than Ian Thomas. 

You don't want a guy like that around a team with a bunch of youth at WR, especially when DJ isn't the vocal leader type, which is fine. Right now the loudest voice in the receiver room is almost certainly Robby. 

Get him gone, please. 

...I shee whacha shayin man..u feel me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think the Ian Thomas contract is worse.  At least Robbie had 1k receiving yards in 2020 while Thomas has shown…?

 

But yes, please get rid of this guy.  I’d take anything for him right now.  Shi Smith started looking improved and Terrace was making some grabs.  Season is cooked, at least let the young guys get reps.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...