Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An analysis of what went wrong between Tepper and Rhule by Charles Robinson


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I like how they use the excuse that the reason Cam was cut originally was because of his health. He then went on to put up 3300 yards and 21 TDs for an offense he had 5 weeks to learn and featured Damiere Byrd as the #1 WR, and he also got covid 4 weeks in which slowed his development even more. Those numbers Cam put up have been better than any other QB we've had since. That will always be Tepper/Rhules biggest mistake and they have no one to blame but themselves. Glad to see they both got what they deserved

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CatMan72 said:

Good read, always bothered me that Rhule came into the league with a manifesto to get Teddy. Giving him 60 mil and then cutting him after one season while repeatedly throwing him under the bus fractured my confidence in Rhule too.

IIRC everyone said that it was pressure from Joe Brady that brought Teddy to Carolina. 🤷🏼‍♂️ I fault Hurney for that contract not Rhule. He had a passion for overpaying bad talent.

8 hours ago, trueblade said:

I've said elsewhere it feels like we're headed towards a Bills hire Rex Ryan move.

lol OMG that's a lesson the Pegula's learned fast. Loud mouth does not equal good coach. I hope that's a lesson Tepper will skip.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda odd the article barely mentions Darnold, who I'd argue giving away 3 picks for and paying his current $19M salary to sit on IR/bench is worse than the relatively minor financial setback from picking up Teddy. I get that it was a clean slate and Teppers first taste of Rhule's bad decision making but I think most of us just assumed Teddy was going to be a 2-3 year bridge QB while we groomed a QB from the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Kinda odd the article barely mentions Darnold, who I'd argue giving away 3 picks for and paying his current $19M salary to sit on IR/bench is worse than the relatively minor financial setback from picking up Teddy. I get that it was a clean slate and Teppers first taste of Rhule's bad decision making but I think most of us just assumed Teddy was going to be a 2-3 year bridge QB while we groomed a QB from the draft. 

Ironically enough teddy was the shiniest turd in the bowl. They dropped him with no realistic shot or plan to upgrade the position. Stafford was never coming here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule was a bad hire that caused a multitude of issues that’s going to take some seasons to fix, hence why more than half the board was pissed with the sam darnold trade and when he was brought back this year…..complete waste, cause we all knew he was getting fired barring some miracle.

If we had just let cam play out the last year instead of paying teddy, and than trading for sam and baker our future would be a lot brighter.

draft and develop, and take a swing at qb when the opportunity arises, if my non billionaire ass can see that idk how the actual millionaires can’t 

Edited by Cpt slay a ho
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m still trippin over Tepper giving Rhule 7 years. Even if you felt he was the guy back then, he was still an unproven college coach. Give him a 3/4 year deal at most. It’s quite clear no one knew what they were doing. Trusting Hurney in the first place was a huge mistake.

 

Get a consultant in here, and do this thing right. We’re right where we were in 2019/2020. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted at 2:40 am.  Is the OP on the WC or having trouble sleeping?

So the reports were that Stafford didn't want to come here, but now Tepper killed the deal?

Does anybody seriously believe that Stafford would choose us over the Rams?

Talk about a piece with a lot of speculation.

 

Edited by poundaway
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...