Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks ain't it


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, frankw said:

Agreed so you should have been voicing the same concerns for the last year plus with Rhule because he was horrendous at all of that.

Awww.  Poor FrankenChuck.  Wilks wasn't the savior you predicted him to be.  Elfien wasn't just a "Rhule guy"  Chuba wasn't just a "Rhule guy".   

It was Wilks first week.  Give him a chance.  I'm sure all your fluffing will pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Having literally nothing to lose, against a team you have on the ropes, and playing to get to halftime was the wrong message and wrong decision on many levels. The game ended there. 

PJ probably turns it over giving the Rams a short field. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Awww.  Poor FrankenChuck.  Wilks wasn't the savior you predicted him to be.  Elfien wasn't just a "Rhule guy"  Chuba wasn't just a "Rhule guy".   

It was Wilks first week.  Give him a chance.  I'm sure all your fluffing will pay off.

Yeah definitely didn't predict him the savior to clean up a mess that took two years to create you know that's nonsense. You are fully unhinged right now to be talking down to anyone about fluffing when you have been Rhule's personal defense force for over a year now. You are legit nuts but keep spamming poo reactions I've already got about a dozen notifications from you alone today psycho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Worst OC, worst QBs and 3 of the 5 worst WRs in the NFL playing out there. I thought guys still tried. Hard to tell when Walker/Marshall/Smith try, because they suck either way.

Devil’s advocate here, but I do find it funny that now I’m seeing a lot of fans blame WRs, the OC and the QB now that Rhule is gone.. I’m by no means a Rhule fan or apologists, but when Rhule was here everyone solely blamed him and him alone but now that Wilks is out there, it’s suddenly the players and OC faults 🤔🤔

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Yeah definitely didn't predict him the savior to clean up a mess that took two years to create you know that's nonsense. You are fully unhinged right now to be talking down to anyone about fluffing when you have been Rhule's personal defense force for over a year now. You are legit nuts but keep spamming poo reactions I've already got about a dozen notifications from you alone today psycho.

I know you thought it would be all better now.  Its ok Frankie. 

It's Wilks first week.  Give the guy a chance.

Maybe you could try fluffing harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

He sucks ass as a HC. No one could say why he was good besides pointless platitudes like "he's a leader of men" or "he embodies keep pounding". Weirdest huddle crush I have seen in my time posting here.

Lol, 'Remember the Titans!!'. He's the next Denzel! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I know you thought it would be all better now.  Its ok Frankie. 

It's Wilks first week.  Give the guy a chance.

Maybe you could try fluffing harder.

Ironic after all your bluster and accusations of fans here rooting against people you certainly sound like one of the folks you've railed against. There's a word for that. Have a good night. Talk to a therapist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think Wilks is a good HC either. Yes we had our 4th string QB but so what? Our play calling sucked. Other coaches have done better with less. Pj  has been in the NFL for a few years and has been on our team for years so he knew the offense. Also look how our players acted under him. You had a player and a coach lose it on national tv.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Ironic after all your bluster and accusations of fans here rooting against people you certainly sound like one of the folks you've railed against. There's a word for that. Have a good night. Talk to a therapist.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Frank, I'm sorry things aren't turning out better as you insisted over and over that they would.

Be patient.  Maybe next week.

 

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...