Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lisa McCaffery on CMC trade rumors


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Bro I've been on these boards for 10 years and you've doubled my post count in the 1 year you've been here.

Also in case you're not just playing dumb, even if I was on here as much as you..."incel" and "terminally online" are not synonymous.  You being both doesn't make those terms interchangeable.

Incel in this context is just another way to trash someone for saying they live on the internet. Billions of human beings are doing the exact same thing including you social media is booming so big flex there bud. Appreciate the input.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Sorry it hurts your feelings but there is truth to that on why some people give him a pass for losing we see how other players are treated around here.

My feelings aren't affected.

Yours are clearly very much affected.

You were upset by what happened with Cam. So now you want fans of "the white runningback" to be hurt the same way.

It's one thing to tie your feelings to the fortune of a football team (loads of people do that) but to tie them to a team's roster decisions to the point of hoping other fans get their feelings hurt the way yours were?

Do you not see how neurotic that is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

My feelings aren't affected.

Yours are clearly very much affected.

You were upset by what happened with Cam. So now you want fans of "the white runningback" to be hurt the same way.

It's one thing to tie your feelings to the fortune of a football team (loads of people do that) but to tie them to a team's roster decisions to the point of hoping other fans get their feelings hurt the way yours were?

Do you not see how neurotic that is?

I'm bothered that we're losing and we have been losing for years. You keep wanting to make this about Cam but we actually won from time to time while he was here. If Cam did nothing but lose no way in hell anyone here would be fostering this wholesome hard working nice guy persona that gives 200% every snap. But keep keeping on you can't change the records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

I'd miss CMC but would be happy for him. Clearly going 100% despite no chance to win for us.  What else could a fan ask for?

 

I'd miss him too, but productive RB's are a dime a dozen these days and be gotten in the 5th round.  Hell, you can get a decent RB as an undrafted free agent now.  The hopefully first round pick we would get in return for CMC is more valuable right now, IMO.  Let him go chase a ring on a good team. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm bothered that we're losing and we have been losing for years. You keep wanting to make this about Cam but we actually won from time to time while he was here. If Cam did nothing but lose no way in hell anyone here would be fostering this wholesome hard working nice guy persona that gives 200% every snap. But keep keeping on you can't change the records.

Wins and losses are a team stat, but if you wanna make it about a player Cam has done nothing but lose his last dozen starts yet still has a pretty strong fanbase here.

As to McCaffrey, yeah he's an elite player. Pretty much everyone acknowledges that. That's why, if he is traded, it needs to be for a really good haul. If he's not, yes he can be a big help to a rookie quarterback and/or a new head coach.

Bottom Line: Sorry your feelings got hurt, but neither McCaffrey nor the people who like and cheer for him were responsible for that.

Let it go already...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, frankw said:

Incel in this context is just another way to trash someone for saying they live on the internet. Billions of human beings are doing the exact same thing including you social media is booming so big flex there bud. Appreciate the input.

Uh no.  There surprisingly are a few people who spend more time on these boards than you do, and I don't think they're incels at all.  You're just by far the most contemptuous, bitter, resentful, spiteful poster I've seen traverse these boards in my aforementioned 10 years, combined with your constant evoking of sexual acts to characterize people you hate (Rhule, Darnold, now CMC) come together to make a perfect little Incel cocktail.  But the more time you spend in here instead of potentially seeking more dangerous outlets for your resentment in the real world, the better for society.  So I can genuinely say I'm glad to have you here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wins and losses are a team stat, but if you wanna make it about a player Cam has done nothing but lose his last dozen starts yet still has a pretty strong fanbase here.

As to McCaffrey, yeah he's an elite player. Pretty much everyone acknowledges that. That's why, if he is traded, it needs to be for a really good haul. If he's not, yes he can be a big help to a rookie quarterback and/or a new head coach.

Bottom Line: Sorry your feelings got hurt, but neither McCaffrey nor the people who like and cheer for him were responsible for that.

Let it go already...

Scot you have well over 100k posts here and I saw the ones back when we lost games with Cam and you were definitely not saying wins and losses were a team stat and defending losing. If you want to deny it go ahead. I'm sure others remember it as well. We don't need to keep dragging this out. Thanks for the chat.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Uh no.  There surprisingly are a few people who spend more time on these boards than you do, and I don't think they're incels at all.  You're just by far the most contemptuous, bitter, resentful, spiteful poster I've seen traverse these boards in my aforementioned 10 years, combined with your constant evoking of sexual acts to characterize people you hate (Rhule, Darnold, now CMC) come together to make a perfect little Incel cocktail.  But the more time you spend in here instead of potentially seeking more dangerous outlets for your resentment in the real world, the better for society.  So I can genuinely say I'm glad to have you here.

You are awfully concerned with the sex lives of complete strangers. And I'm the one in need of psychoanalysis?

Right Right Right Lol GIF by Late Night with Seth Meyers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Teddy Bridgewater: eviscerated

Sam Darnold: eviscerated

Baker Mayfield: eviscerated

PJ Walker: eviscerated

Matt Corral: eviscerated

Shaq Thompson: eviscerated

Robbie Anderson: eviscerated

Donte Jackson: eviscerated

Brian Burns: eviscerated

Derrick Brown: eviscerated

DJ Moore: eviscerated

Taylor Moton: eviscerated

Christian McCaffrey: oh please let him go to a contender I'll even root for him he deserves all good things

Very few people are eviscerating DJ, Burns, Brown (these days) etc. And you are also sorta proving the point its not about race. You've been embarrassingly called out on this by numerous posters. Cause its obvious you are inconsistent and making something out of this that isn't actually there. But by all means, keep hating on CMC thinking his support is a race issue. It obvious makes everyone else think you are incredibly smart!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
    • Spot-on. D-line and FS are much bigger immediate needs than OT or WR. Look at the current roster and the fact that they have not brought in any new players at those positions. 
×
×
  • Create New...