Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud

Vox

By Vox,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

It's a fair debate. But the counter would be that he could be ahead in his development. It's not like a team wouldn't have used a top 10 for  Kurt Warner's career that effectively started at 28.

That’s what a team will be hoping for, but I’d bet most teams in the top 10 probably wouldn’t risk it, maybe a team picking in the teens might though.

Hypothetically, if a team like Atlanta or Seattle happens to over preform this year and are sitting around #18, I wouldn’t be totally shocked to see Hooker go early (assuming Levis is already gone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

If he plays like he's been playing he's going way ahead of 18 IMO.  He's already being talked about as potentially top QB prospect.

I think he’d have to put up Burrow numbers for that to happen. At 25, he’ll be the second oldest QB since 1967 to be drafted in the first round (assuming he is).

Edit: he would be the third oldest because the numbers are based on the individuals birthday as of 9/1.

I see him going right around where Pickett was taken.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Stroud's placement is elite, there is no disputing that, WRs open or not, his ball placement is ridiculous.  Anyone saying otherwise is just not being honest or not watching OSU games.  It is possible to parse out the skill even in a relatively handicapped offense.

Not trying to rely too much on O'Sullivan but his videos show the plays you're looking for...good lord look at the fly route at the :50 mark.  He breaks it down as well quite well.  

Here's also a new upload that breaks down Bryce v. Stroud

I'd just advise those who have only watched highlights so far to tune into an OSU game.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I've been saying he's the best of this class. I really really really like Levis but that speaks more to the class as a whole not being special.

I'm really going to have to see more from everyone for the remainder of the season, and study scouting reports before I come to a conclusion. I like some things that I've seen from Levis and Levis  (but NOT enough to say they are any better of a prospect than Corral, I might add).

Hooker looked impressive from what I saw last week.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Back to back bad throws and 2 dropped picks vs Iowa.

Lol pass on Stroud

C’mon man… the second one was fine throw and the type of throw that NFL QB’s make every day, the receiver has to get his head around.

Trolling over two throws is fugging foolish.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Snake said:

It doesn't concern me as much as not being able to see over your line. I swear youngtards will try anything to make their guy look better. 

This is so stupid lmao. People act like Alabama’s O-Line and the SEC D’s they play have 6’1 linemen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...