Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud


Vox
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Stroud looks legit, Young looks legit (a little small, but I’ll wait on official measurements), and Levis might be the most NFL ready with a high ceiling. It’s a good year to suck IMO. 

At least there are options in case we mess around and win a game or 2. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I agree that we need a backup, but you don't draft a backup with the first choice of the draft.  

This would more dumb than drafting an LT with your top 5 pick and making him compete with a day two pick from the previous year whose arms you said were too short to play LT.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, rayzor said:

This would more dumb than drafting an LT with your top 5 pick and making him compete with a day two pick from the previous year whose arms you said were too short to play LT.

So are you saying that the 2023 rookie is the starter no matter what?  

Thanks to Rhule's we have no true gauge on how Corral can play.   I would think that there would be a true competition.  We'll have a new offense so neither QB will have an edge.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

So are you saying that the 2023 rookie is the starter no matter what?  

Thanks to Rhule's we have no true gauge on how Corral can play.   I would think that there would be a true competition.  We'll have a new offense so neither QB will have an edge.

2023 rookie is the starter no matter what in my eyes yea.  Would love to see corral develop but the only QB that’ll start over the first pick is going to be some Vet they bring in for a few weeks max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me seeing CJ Stroud come into the Panthers huddle is like Michael Scott seeing Toby Flenderson come into The Office.  "No, GOOOOODDDDD NOOOOOO".

The last big time Ohio State QB threw himself into traffic he was so bad, and Justin Fields is headed that direction, pun intended.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stan786 said:

2023 rookie is the starter no matter what in my eyes yea.  Would love to see corral develop but the only QB that’ll start over the first pick is going to be some Vet they bring in for a few weeks max.

That's a foolish approach.  You have to give Corral an opportunity to compete.  No one in here can truly say he's bust.  While the rookie may start the offseason as #1 you have to give both the opportunity to show what they can do.  

I'm not implying whatsoever that Corral is better than any QB in this draft but he should and most likely will get an opportunity to compete for the position.  

My point is, if he were to win than that #1 pick just went to waste.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

That's a foolish approach.  You have to give Corral an opportunity to compete.  No one in here can truly say he's bust.  While the rookie may start the offseason as #1 you have to give both the opportunity to show what they can do.  

I'm not implying whatsoever that Corral is better than any QB in this draft but he should and most likely will get an opportunity to compete for the position.  

My point is, if he were to win than that #1 pick just went to waste.

Draft capital matters that’s the NFL. Coaches that hand pick their QB is going to give him all the chances to develop.  Avoiding picking a Franchise QB at 1.01 because of the long shot that corral beats them out would be a losing decision 100%.  

There’s a reason corral fell to the third round, there’s a reason he couldn’t beat out even PJ Walker in the preseason. Dictating your draft plan based on a meh preseason from a late third round QB when you have a QB worth the 1.01 is on the board is a fireable offense. 
 

If corral has a miraculous improvement and somehow wins the job it’s not a waste of a pick, we found a QB and that’s the most important thing in the NFL, but to plan on that possibility is insanely short sighted.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stan786 said:

there’s a reason he couldn’t beat out even PJ Walker in the preseason.

You must not have followed preseason.  Most would agree that Rhule wasn't going to give Corral a true shot.  PJ is on the Panthers only because Rhule wanted him.  He's only on the roster because we don't have a QB.  Many of the huddlers, including myself, said when Rhule pulled his stunt on Corral, it was going to force us to take a QB in this years draft.

I'm not going to get into the argument that our incoming rookie is 100% better than Corral.  No one can say one way or the other until we actually see them play.

I have no doubt that we are choosing a QB in this draft, but to anoint him the starter just because he was chosen #1.  The bust rate for #1 QB is very possible.  IMO none of the QBs in this draft are surefire franchise QBs.  If there was, this forum would 95% be onboard with one QB. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not going to get into the argument that our incoming rookie is 100% better than Corral.  No one can say one way or the other until we actually see them play.

As college players, Young and Stroud are better than Corral was. That said, I agree with you about not knowing how that will translate to the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You must not have followed preseason.  Most would agree that Rhule wasn't going to give Corral a true shot.  PJ is on the Panthers only because Rhule wanted him.  He's only on the roster because we don't have a QB.  Many of the huddlers, including myself, said when Rhule pulled his stunt on Corral, it was going to force us to take a QB in this years draft.

I'm not going to get into the argument that our incoming rookie is 100% better than Corral.  No one can say one way or the other until we actually see them play.

I have no doubt that we are choosing a QB in this draft, but to anoint him the starter just because he was chosen #1.  The bust rate for #1 QB is very possible.  IMO none of the QBs in this draft are surefire franchise QBs.  If there was, this forum would 95% be onboard with one QB. 

 

I wouldn't argue that Rhule didnt screw it up, I was also very frustrated at how he handled that.  I'd say you couldnt argue that corral put anything on tape that wow'd you.  I'm arguing that based on the fact the coaching staff coming in will have no loyalty to corral and will hand pick the QB we are drafting, the fact that raw talent wise the QB we draft will be more desired than Corral, and the fact Corral hasnt put good tape out there makes it nearly impossible for him to win the starting job. 

I do think a veteran stop gap could win the job but I think that corral could have a hard time beating him out as well sadly.  I think corral could 100% develop into an NFL QB I like a number of his traits, but you cant let that make you skip the QBs in this draft.  All players can bust sure but statistically Corral has a greater chance of busting than a top 10 QB as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...