Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp.. Levis, Hooker or McKee come on down.


panthersgreenville
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I’ve seen that talked about as a possibility. Being compared to Josh Allen at the same point in their careers. 

Scouts are in love with Levis's potential. Based on how we plays this Saturday and the 19th of November, that will seal his fate in this draft.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surveying the positioning, Detroit, Houston, Seattle (Through DEN), *Saints, & Atlanta are the other teams that could be in position to take a QB.  

Denver really does look bad, and will likely fire Hackett, but I can see them pulling out some more wins to keep Seattle from the top of the draft.  Though imagine that move if Russell nets them everything they got from Denver including a top-5 pick for a new franchise QB?  Same with Saints and Atlanta.  Both have enough offense to win games.

Detroit and Houston are the two to watch.  Lions..they still get the Bears twice and us Christmas Eve.   Texans though, yeah I can see them with maybe only 1-2 wins left on their calendar.  

*edit: scratch the Saints

Edited by davos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a long season. And there is LOT of bad football being played. 

We're also seeing the decline of alot of veteran QB's. This looks like a down year for football performance wise and coaching wise. Our best, inspired football can make us mediocre enough to not get better when everyone starts hitting their stride. 

Gonna be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, davos said:

Surveying the positioning, Detroit, Houston, Seattle (Through DEN), *Saints, & Atlanta are the other teams that could be in position to take a QB.  

Denver really does look bad, and will likely fire Hackett, but I can see them pulling out some more wins to keep Seattle from the top of the draft.  Though imagine that move if Russell nets them everything they got from Denver including a top-5 pick for a new franchise QB?  Same with Saints and Atlanta.  Both have enough offense to win games.

Detroit and Houston are the two to watch.  Lions..they still get the Bears twice and us Christmas Eve.   Texans though, yeah I can see them with maybe only 1-2 wins left on their calendar.  

*edit: scratch the Saints

yeah I don’t think anyone is beating the lions for #1 

 

that is an awful team with a brutal schedule 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

Its a long season. And there is LOT of bad football being played. 

We're also seeing the decline of alot of veteran QB's. This looks like a down year for football performance wise and coaching wise. Our best, inspired football can make us mediocre enough to not get better when everyone starts hitting their stride. 

Gonna be interesting. 

True.

Potential 2023 QB needy:

NFCS: (4) Falcons, Saints, Panthers, Bucs

NFCE: (2) Commanders, Giants

NFCN: (3) Packers, Lions, Bears

NFCW: (2) Seattle, 49ers 

AFCS: (3) Texans, Colts, Titans (maybe)

AFCE: (2) Patriots, Jets

AFCN: (1) Pittsburgh (may not be sold on Pickett)

AFCW: (1) Raiders

That's over half the league.  This league could hit a pretty substantial QB drought if this next draft doesn't produce any good ones.  From my view, the last 2 drafts are not looking like good one at the position, so maybe we lucked out with our spiraling under Rhule.  Lamar, Allen, Burrow, Tua, Herbert, Hurts..that's really it since 2018. Not sold on Lawrence yet so he's a maybe.  And that's mostly AFC so the NFC is gonna be a battlefield to find the next best QB.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...