Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O-Line Performance vs Tampa


Vox
 Share

Recommended Posts

We have six OL under contract next season.  If we can re-sign Bozeman for cheap, that will be seven.  Honestly we can draft a swing tackle on day three and acquire a undrafted /dirt cheap FA guard, our OL is set!  Wow, that feels freaking odd because our OL had been a train wreck for so long.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4Corners said:

I don’t know if anything he did well here except from not embarrassing the team or city off the field and picking kickers 

Couldn't name much of anything, honestly.

Yet despite that fact, just about up until it's firing I had people adamantly arguing with me that he was a good coach and I needed to support him.

I think my personal favorite was the guy whose basic argument was that he could "just flat out coach" 🙄

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Couldn't name much of anything, honestly.

Yet despite that fact, just about up until it's firing I had people adamantly arguing with me that he was a good coach and I needed to support him.

I think my personal favorite was the guy whose basic argument was that he could "just flat out coach" 🙄

I think what they meant to say was “he could be flat out  out coached.”

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Couldn't name much of anything, honestly.

Yet despite that fact, just about up until it's firing I had people adamantly arguing with me that he was a good coach and I needed to support him.

I think my personal favorite was the guy whose basic argument was that he could "just flat out coach" 🙄

He’d probably be a good coach at UNC Charlotte or ECU where he is a small fish in a big pond, and can coach up a bunch of 2* and 3* athletes against ferocious competition like Tulsa, Western Carolina, and UAB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

He’d probably be a good coach at UNC Charlotte or ECU where he is a small fish in a big pond, and can coach up a bunch of 2* and 3* athletes against ferocious competition like Tulsa, Western Carolina, and UAB. 

He really seems like a guy that loved the idea of coaching instead of actually coaching.  Snow was the Xs and Os actual dude implementing game plans and Rhule is the just a face; I really never saw the pure football aptitude with him.  Very politician-y. Seems way better suited to be this Czar of a mid-tier college squad that focuses on speech-circuits and recruiting.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FugginPoo said:

If we had fired Rhule/Snow last year this would be a defense and OL led playoff team, especially given NFC South

We also would probably have a young QB in Fields who is getting better under a terrible line in Chicago and not another CB who can't stay healthy. Rhule and Snow were terrible. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boz didn't disappoint and was again proof that if you were a Rhule guy, you are the wrong guy. He should have been starting all year.

BC is great in the passing game but he is still a liability in the run game. He looks like the biggest weakness on the line and that is a great problem to have for a team that has had years of crap oline play. 

We are finally looking like a team that has what it needs to develop a young QB. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...