Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bump This Thread Everytime Refs Fug Us


Castavar
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's just a franchise thing at this point:

Cam "you're too young to get that call" Newton

Cam getting speared on national television with no flags

BS roughing the passer on Jacobi Brissett to help the Browns kick the game winning FG.

Missed intentional grounding on fake spike from Brissett on same drive.

Missed false start AND holding on Falcons LT on their go ahead TD to Byrd

Cotchery caught that fuggin ball

Refs blowing the play dead when we are literally in the sequence of a tackle and fumble against Dallas last year

Calling a BS intentional grounding on Cam against the saints in the wild card when he was literally outside the pocket.

And make no mistake, there WILL be more this year and in the future. We've been getting shafted from the refs since I can remember.

 

  • Pie 7
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Basically every fan base thinks the refs screw  them when they lose 

 

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There is no conspiracy. Please stop.

Cleveland missed two calls that would change the final score. Both were against the panthers.

Falicons game in the last drive before OT, the whole Left side faults starts like 5 times. Zero calls, if you got the DVR watch for it.

The panthers drive before the refs threw like 8 flags as PJ kept making the 3rd downs.

Its the 50/50 that always seem to go the other way. It feels like when it could go both ways, its like 80/20 against the panthers. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

Cleveland missed two calls that would change the final score. Both were against the panthers.

Falicons game in the last drive before OT, the whole Left side faults starts like 5 times. Zero calls, if you got the DVR watch for it.

The panthers drive before the refs threw like 8 flags as PJ kept making the 3rd downs.

Its the 50/50 that always seem to go the other way. It feels like when it could go both ways, its like 80/20 against the panthers. 

 

It's not a conspiracy. Please stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

2013-2014 Divisional round vs 49ers was another fug job by the refs

Holy sh*t I guess I had that blocked from my mind from anger, but everything just came rushing back. That game was utter BS. Don't even want to think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...