Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Confirmed: Al Holcomb is not good at his job


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

What is this?  3 weeks now since Rhule and Snow were fired?  Each game seems to get worse defensively.  We can't stop anyone and can't even slow them down.  What happened in the first half today, I don't ever recall seeing that happen to a defense in our entire history.  If they could've even played halfway worth a poo last week, we win that game easy, but it ended up being a seesaw battle because the defense is a fuging sieve.  I love Wilks and appreciate him, but Holcomb ain't it as DC.  I know the roster has holes and such, but it is still mostly intact from what Snow had to work with, and it looks 100 times worse.

Maybe it's Holcomb trying to fit the college-style pieces we had for Snow's system into a pro-scheme, but this poo is way worse than anything Snow ran.  This is just bad.  Really bad.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smithers said:

Tried to tell y’all that the defense was going to be much worse off without Snow.  I despised Rhule, but Snows defense was good when not put in bad situations

I agree, but it had to be done because Rhule was just that bad.  But my God, this is just inexcusable.  I can't imagine us getting worse than this defensively next week, buy then again, we are the Panthers.  Anything (bad) is possible.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I agree, but it had to be done because Rhule was just that bad.  But my God, this is just inexcusable.  I can't imagine us getting worse than this defensively next week, buy then again, we are the Panthers.  Anything (bad) is possible.

Phil Snow would not have made this better.

This undersized defense was built to his specifications.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Phil Snow would not have made this better.

This undersized defense was built to his specifications.

We are very light at the linebacker position. Snow wanted to run primarily 4-3, and 3-3, with 5 DBs. News flash, light linebackers and heavy secondary players equals lots and lots of running yards. I am disappointed we aren’t sending more corner blitzes, it’s about all we can do.

Edited by philit99
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, philit99 said:

We are very light at the linebacker position. Snow wanted to run primarily 4-3, and 3-3, with 5 DBs. News flash, light linebackers and heavy secondary players equals lots and lots of running yards. I am disappointed we aren’t sending more corner blitzes, it’s about all we can do.

Yeah the lack of blitzes is a problem. I also hate playing so much zone

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...