Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That motion sweep pass to Shenault


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, top dawg said:

They limit what PJ can do, because they're scared he is going to throw a pick, rightly or wrongly. It's a catch-22. At least I hope that's why they're calling so many passes behind the line. I just can't condone that type of play calling because it's too damned elementary, and teams worth a damn will make you pay. Hopefully it's just a P.J. thing, but I have my suspicions.

Considering how many near INT's he had from throwing directly at a defender I would say that gameplan was obvious. Works against bad teams but when you go up against an offense with a real franchise QB it's night night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Growl said:

that dude is the panthers cordarrelle patterson, they need to not bother trying to turn him into Marvin Harrison and open TC next season working him on kicks, punts, RB, etc etc etc

We really don't use him like a conventional receiver at all.  He's basically used almost exclusively on swing passes; hell, his touchdown was considered a run because it was thrown behind the line of scrimmage which is emblematic of how he's used lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, top dawg said:

They limit what PJ can do, because they're scared he is going to throw a pick, rightly or wrongly. It's a catch-22. At least I hope that's why they're calling so many passes behind the line. I just can't condone that type of play calling because it's too damned elementary, and teams worth a damn will make you pay. Hopefully it's just a P.J. thing, but I have my suspicions.

Yeah I thought it was ironic that we were all complaining in PJ's first start against the Rams how Wilks didn't even try to go for points with a minute left in the 1st half and 3 timeouts.  Then the following week against the Falcons, we were essentially in the same position with a minute left in the 1st half and we did try for points but PJ threw that pick-six which was a gamechanger.  Even though I still think you try for the points in that situation 10/10 times and I think that pick-six was more of an amazing play by the defender rather than a poor decision by PJ...it still almost validated Wilks' restraint and hesitation when it comes to PJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

Well he scored a TD on it last night. 

Then the falcons keyed in on it. 
 

they want to get Shenault the ball with a head of steam but they’re pretty limited by what PJ can do, unfortunately. 

this. if everyone remembers, Shenault scored his first TD a few weeks ago off this play, then again off it last night. that's why they kept going back to it, I guess of the 5 or 6 times they've done it, 2 of which have been breakaway TD's. He is a big boy to bring down full speed and tacklers don't want any part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I don’t know why he’s still starting aside from Mayfield’s trade draft pick. We are damn lucky Atlanta dropped the interceptions. The first one would have taken away the FG and the last one would have tied the game (because of Kip’s miss). The last one was so far behind DJ even without him seeing the DB and is a throw you can’t make up 7 with so little time left. Thank goodness Mariota was even worse.

You'd have to assume if we arent intentionaly tanking ... he isnt starting the next game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s hard to figure out. That dropped interception at the end was mind boggling to watch but maybe the Falcons are deciding they need a new Mariota as well! 

Panthers head coach Steve Wilks said he expects P.J. Walker to start in Week 11 against the Ravens. 

Walker "led" the Panthers to a Week 10 win over the Falcons with 108 yards on 16 pass attempts in another massively run heavy game plan for Carolina. The Panther ran roughshod over the Falcons for 232 yards and two scores in an ugly Thursday night victory. Walker has been mostly terrible as Carolina's starter this season but remains an upgrade over Baker Mayfield, the NFL's worst quarterback, according to EPA. Walker should only be rostered in deeper superflex leagues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, saying Walker "led" the Panthers to a win is stretching it.  Mostly, he didn't give the game away, but he tried.  As has been talked about, he hit two defenders in the hands, one of which may have been returned for a TD had it been caught. 

His limit is the short passes they are running with him and hail Mary's/bombs, that even if they are picked should not result in points against us.  That is why I have never thought he was viable backup, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, top dawg said:

They limit what PJ can do, because they're scared he is going to throw a pick, rightly or wrongly. It's a catch-22. At least I hope that's why they're calling so many passes behind the line. I just can't condone that type of play calling because it's too damned elementary, and teams worth a damn will make you pay. Hopefully it's just a P.J. thing, but I have my suspicions.

Kansas City has won a ton of games on dumpoffs , screens and swing passes. No one thinks Mahomes is being held back. Sometimes simple is great.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Walker's average intended air yards are higher than Lawrence, Hurts, Mahomes, Rogers, Brady, Burrow, Cousins, Herbert, Murray, Stafford....among others who aren't worth mentioning.

 

https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/stats/passing#average-intended-yards

That's fine, but a little deceiving. He hasn't passed as nearly as much as most of them. But completing those passes is the most important, without INTs I might add. 

20 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Kansas City has won a ton of games on dumpoffs , screens and swing passes. No one thinks Mahomes is being held back. Sometimes simple is great.

Sure, it works against some teams, but won't against others. I'm all for limiting Walker's potential screwups; I just think that when you're playing the league'sbworat passing defense, there's probably a way to get a more decisive victory. I can't really fault Wilks for his game plan, but I'm still skeptical that it would work against superior competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That's fine, but a little deceiving. He hasn't passed as nearly as much as most of them. But completing those passes is the most important, without INTs I might add. 

Sure, it works against some teams, but won't against others. I'm all for limiting Walker's potential screwups; I just think that when you're playing the league'sbworat passing defense, there's probably a way to get a more decisive victory. I can't really fault Wilks for his game plan, but I'm still skeptical that it would work against superior competition.

I agree that Walker is very inconsistent. One pass he threads between 2 defenders and other times you want to know who in the heck was he throwing to. Wilks tends to be conservative and wants to limit mistakes most of all. So he is limiting what PJ is allowed to do to keep the mistakes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...