Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other NFL Games Thread

kungfoodude

By kungfoodude,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The Rams' coaches apparently did a thing called watching film on him and designing plays to match what he does well. 

I guess the analytics said that was not a wise use of our coaches' time.

 

It's not secret he had his best numbers in Cleveland rolling out of play action. He didn't even need a running game to do it tonight, Cam Akers doesn't scare anyone. We had the better O-line and RB group and still couldn't get a power run game/play action system going 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Hey Ben. How about designing a game plan for the players we actually have. 

You understand that the playbook is the playbook at this point right?

Both on offense and defense. 

Just because Rhule was fired Wilks can't have a whole new offense abracadabraed out of thin air. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

We are the laughing stock of the league rn 

Deservedly. On the shortest of weeks, in Primetime, for the world to see in neon lights, we are the biggest joke in the league right now.

And Matt Rhule manged to get another job. Dream big because you can do anything, kids.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You understand that the playbook is the playbook at this point right?

Both on offense and defense. 

Just because Rhule was fired Wilks can't have a whole new offense abracadabraed out of thin air. 

Sure they can invent new plays. Yes, they aren't going to reinvent the wheel but they sure as hell can stop something if it's not working.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You understand that the playbook is the playbook at this point right?

Both on offense and defense. 

Just because Rhule was fired Wilks can't have a whole new offense abracadabra out of thin air. 

It's called adjusting. The offensive playbook was poo the first 5 games and has been ever since. You can change plays. You don't have to change the entire playbook but trying to run RPO with a QB that can't run will not work. There are things that could be pulled out of the playbook and new things put in. It's not like Baker has had months to learn an entire new scheme in LA. He had 2 days. They made a plan that fit the QB, not make the QB fit the plan. And he looked better tonight than he has in months in Carolina. Wilks is the HC. He can tell Ben to stop running the stuff that doesn't work. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, chbright said:

Crowning baker after he defeats the raiders. The same raiders that got out coaches by Jeff Saturday, who had never coach a game......... Hmmmmmm

Not crowning. Simply stating the reality that he looked a lot better after 30 hours with McVay than he ever did here, even though he was working out of a heavily trimmed down playbook and backup WRs and OTs. Make no mistake about it, the entire league is laughing at us right now.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, chbright said:

Crowning baker after he defeats the raiders. The same raiders that got out coaches by Jeff Saturday, who had never coach a game......... Hmmmmmm

It’s more a clowning of our poo coaching staff than a crowning of baker. Just pure coincidence that he looked like he Clausen while he was here and looked like an actual NFL QB after 2 days of joining a new team

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...