Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The LA Rams are 3-7…. We had their second round pick this year


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Rags said:

This place is absolutely insufferable.

Half of the posters who are complaining abt these picks aren't even in the scouting scene, let alone can barely tell you the players coming out THIS year let alone players two fuging drafts from now but will insist that two MYSTERY PLAYERS are better than our edge rusher because they COULD be top 10 picks.

unironically yes

id rather give a new coaching/fo staff their pick of players rather than waste time and cap space with mediocre hurney/rivera/rhule/fitt era players who are incredibly overrated by fans because this franchise has very little talent overall these days

yeah, it might fail and they pick shittier players than burns/moore, but this is already a failed franchise with 3 straight 5 win seasons.

 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

unironically yes

id rather give a new coaching/fo staff their pick of players rather than waste time and cap space with mediocre hurney/rivera/rhule/fitt era players who are incredibly overrated by fans because this franchise has very little talent overall these days

yeah, it might fail and they pick shittier players than burns/moore, but this is already a failed franchise with 3 straight 5 win seasons.

 

 

Okay but see that doesn't mean get rid of any and all talent. 

Like sure if the new staff comes in and trade Burns because he isn't a fit, sure, whatever.

But to act like Burns < Blind Picks just because a new staff is asinine, our pass rush is poo without him and it is not easy to build pass rush. It's one of those things I strongly feel we take for granted as Panthers fans because we've always had at least one 8-12 sack guy for a period of time. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the sentiment of the thread but it's disingenuous to post this and act like their record would be identical with or without Burns. They lost on a last second TD against Tampa. You really think Burns feasting on the outside next to Aaron Donald wouldn't have been the difference? The game probably wouldn't have been that close, let alone a loss. I still don't think the Rams would be that good so being upset at the trade is still plenty reasonable. But quoting their record sans Burns is not totally valid.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol I love this place. The Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda crowd definitely are entertaining. 

 

The Huddle "We are not a destination for a good coach. Let's trade 2 of our best players. That should help.

By the time all those draft picks make the team. That shiny new coach may be gone from all the losing.

 

Half you guys are stuck in the past. And the other half is in worst case scenario for the future.

 

Sure make reading this place fun.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

lol I love this place. The Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda crowd definitely are entertaining. 

 

The Huddle "We are not a destination for a good coach. Let's trade 2 of our best players. That should help.

By the time all those draft picks make the team. That shiny new coach may be gone from all the losing.

 

Half you guys are stuck in the past. And the other half is in worst case scenario for the future.

 

Sure make reading this place fun.

Considering the huddle has been right more often than Rhule and our GM the past 3 years, they might do better to actually listen to us. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...