Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: "Teams should not wear black jerseys"


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

True statement from the article: Choosing to use black in any fashion, if not part of a team’s color scheme, is lazy, boring

But then there's this:

Here’s a list of teams that can wear black in their main unis or in an alternate, because black is part of their original color scheme:
.
.
Carolina Panthers — only because no one cares
.
.

I think we can all agree -- blue jerseys or black jerseys are where it's at.  White jerseys are questionable at best

Source: https://deadspin.com/teams-should-be-outlawed-from-wearing-black-1849825452

Edited by PanthersATL
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Black absolutely makes sense since you know we are the Panthers.

 

We aren't the Bluebirds. We aren't the Ocean.

 

We are the damn Panthers. Panthers are Black.

I despise the Blue Jerseys and they shouldn't have existed.

You're wrong.  Blue top/white bottom is our best combo.  I said what I said.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like somebody’s personal opinion.  Something in people magazine, or on the view.

Key words are “Lazy”, “Boring “.  This just sounds like an opinion.  Probably was cut off by a black cat 🐈‍⬛ and crashed into the ditch.

there was an opinion, several years ago, that black uniforms were intimidating.  Atlanta Falcon coach, Jerry Glandville, changed team colors from red to black, for this reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're simultaneously in contention for a top 3 draft pick, and winning our division, and it's not every year you get to say that. So now is not the time for a fashion thread. Save that for March when we need something to talk about.

Edited by Captroop
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our logo is a black panther with blue highlights. If you’re going just by what makes the most sense with the team colors and mascot, our primaries would be all black with the blue stripes. Don’t lump us in with the rest of these teams who have no reason to wear black. You ever seen a black falcon?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Black absolutely makes sense since you know we are the Panthers.

 

We aren't the Bluebirds. We aren't the Ocean.

 

We are the damn Panthers. Panthers are Black.

I despise the Blue Jerseys and they shouldn't have existed.

ACKCHYUALLY hair face facial expression person nose text human behavior smile emotion male head cartoon forehead hairstyle cheek clip art black and white eyewear boy vision care

Black "Panthers" do not exist, they are just black jaguars/leopards.

Our mascot is as real as Unicorns and Dragons. We could make our main color whatever we wanted and it would work. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_panther

My apologies for being "that guy"

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...