Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: "Teams should not wear black jerseys"

PanthersATL

By PanthersATL,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, travisura said:

It is genuinely fascinating the level to which you despise literally every single aspect of this franchise, down to the most granular detail. Makes one wonder why you even call yourself a fan of it. 

Maybe that makes me the best fan, because as much as I dislike Charlotte, dislike the uniforms, dislike the team name, dislike Cam's personality, dislike how this team has been run, dislike losing, etc. I still stick by them as my team!

Paramount Network Beth GIF by Yellowstone

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Black absolutely makes sense since you know we are the Panthers.

 

We aren't the Bluebirds. We aren't the Ocean.

 

We are the damn Panthers. Panthers are Black.

I despise the Blue Jerseys and they shouldn't have existed.

The Patriots, Steelers, Vikings, Bills, and Cowboys, for example, are all associated with white people--and they all wear their white jerseys.  The Chiefs wear red.  The Browns wear brown.  You may be onto something!  Except a seahawk is not blue and optic green, and a falcon is not red and black, and an Eagle is not green.  I am so confused--birds must be exempt.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

We could be like the Canes, where in the hell did red and black come from ?, it would had made more sense to keep the whaler colors, because on a weather radar a hurricane is green white and blue, plus half the NHL uses some combination of red,black and white 

Red and Black has been the hurricane flag forever. 

So red and black makes perfect sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Panther

Pink Panther

BLACK Panthers are black 

Technically Mountain Lions aren't in the

Family of Panthers. 

Black Panthers are.

Black Panthers are what sit outside the stadium.

We should be black at home in cool months white at home in hot months period!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...