Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Carolina just unlucky?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, philit99 said:

Home field advantage plays a huge part. Since our fans only show up when we are winning, this chart seems about right. If we had more dedicated loud, raucous fans, it would be different.

Someone gave your post a poo but it's very true and they must be one of the nozzles who do just that as the truth hurts we all know. Here is some pie to make up for that poo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ocpanthertew714 Veteran

Ocpanthertew714

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, NAS said:

You must be fun at parties 

Debbie Downer Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live

 

7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

haha that did come off negative didnt it? Mainly, just stating that you know someone is goin to use this as an excuse to why they didnt have a winnning season or win a super bowl.... or even why a team DID win a super bowl.

Still sounds like the guy who brings his stamp collection to mixers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

Someone gave your post a poo but it's very true and they must be one of the nozzles who do just that as the truth hurts we all know. Here is some pie to make up for that poo.

It was me and blaming the fans for a teams losses is fuging stupid. The same people who do this don’t show up to games themselves unless they have free tickets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

It was me and blaming the fans for a teams losses is fuging stupid. The same people who do this don’t show up to games themselves unless they have free tickets. 

No one is blaming the fans. I’m saying that a screaming crowd will make a kicker miss, or pump the home team up to strip a ball. We just don’t have the following the other teams have and it shows. My god were you there when we played San Francisco? It was me and two other guys in our entire section wearing blue panther gear, everyone else was red. It makes a huge difference.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

It was me and blaming the fans for a teams losses is fuging stupid. The same people who do this don’t show up to games themselves unless they have free tickets. 

I took it as hik not putting all the blame on the fans but stating a true fact that home field advantage does in fact play a very important role. When you have whine and cheese fans who do only show up when the team is winning I can see how it most definitely could affect that home field advantage. It may not be the ultimate deciding factor but nobody can deny home field advantage with rowdy fans most definitely helps the home team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, philit99 said:

No one is blaming the fans. I’m saying that a screaming crowd will make a kicker miss, or pump the home team up to strip a ball. We just don’t have the following the other teams have and it shows. My god were you there when we played San Francisco? It was me and two other guys in our entire section wearing blue panther gear, everyone else was red. It makes a huge difference.

Your first two sentences are just guesses, is there any actual evidence that either of these things happen with more crowd noise? Players practice for road games with simulated noise, they are prepared for it - BOA was pretty fuging loud for that 58 yarder that a rookie kicker drilled in Week one. Blaming the lack of crowd noise to motivate a defense to get turnovers sounds straight out of the Matt Rhule playbook for excuse making.

The San Francisco game was one of the three games I've missed other than the pandemic season in the last 18 years due to prior commitments before the schedule was released. I sold my tickets to that game to a fellow Panther fan at a discount when I could have easily sold for over face to a niner fan. But at that game, (and most others in the last two years) what the fug do you have to cheer for? Can you blame anyone who doesn't want to eat several thousand dollars a year and waste hours of their life to watch the bullshit we've been subjected to? 

I'm just kind of done with people on this board criticizing PSL owners no matter what they do. When we show up to bad football games, we're told that we're content with losing and shouldn't show up to send a message. If we don't, we get blamed for opposing team's fans taking over. Mostly from people who only show up if tickets are free and they're winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

I took it as hik not putting all the blame on the fans but stating a true fact that home field advantage does in fact play a very important role. When you have whine and cheese fans who do only show up when the team is winning I can see how it most definitely could affect that home field advantage. It may not be the ultimate deciding factor but nobody can deny home field advantage with rowdy fans most definitely helps the home team.

see above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...