Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

let's talk about Brock Purdy and Mike White


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

what are yalls thoughts on these two situations?

we have the Jets who drafted Wilson and seem to prefer an perform better with a 5th round cast away. tons of users on here would've done terrible things to draft Wilson, and now look - replaced by some dude that was never on anyone's radar.

then we have the niners, traded their picks away to get Lance who under performed and got injured, now Jimmy's hurt and this Brock kid (THE LAST FUGING PICK IN THE DRAFT) comes out and helps them get a win. Shanahan and Kittle are raving about this dude and I'm getting the vibe he's about to take over.

What does this have to do with us? Well you have two teams that both did whatever they could to draft "their guys" in the top 3 pics and voila. Replaced by late rounders. Lot's of talk about tanking and drafting a first rounder but damn, it's really dicey out there.

What does that have to tell you? What are your thoughts on this?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Allen was picked after the last pick in the draft and came in and helped the panthers get wins. Ditto for PJ. Guys not drafted in the top of the first round are still NFL players and can come in and be productive.  Some can end up being great but most will not be the long term answer. 

I am not big on the tanking philosophy and think that football players and coaches likely don’t subscribe to that rationale either but generally speaking the best players are at the top of the draft.  

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Kyle Allen was picked after the last pick in the draft and came in and helped the panthers get wins. Ditto for PJ. Guys not drafted in the top of the first round are still NFL players and can come in and be productive.  Some can end up being great but most will not be the long term answer. 

I am not big on the tanking philosophy and think that football players and coaches likely don’t subscribe to that rationale either but generally speaking the best players are at the top of the draft.  

For sure, my question though is specifically about these teams that swung for the fences on a top 3 QB and are on the verge of moving on with late rounders.

Just wanted to get peoples opinions on that but clicking the poop emoji is a fun way to pass time this evening as well I guess.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Purdy hasn't even played a full game yet. Literally a month ago, Carolina coaches and his teammates were talking up PJ the exact same way after a close loss and what happened? The talent caught up with him and he put out a stinker in Cincy.

 

Mike White has 8 TDs and 10 int career wise.

 

This is premature, no? Especially Purdy.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are looking at a 50% split whether you choose a 1st rounder a QB chosen outside the 1st round and undrafted QBs.

First rounders will always get more opportunities. Non-first rounders will always play with more of an edge and nothing to lose.

Most QBs will be decent game managers. Most project QBs will fail. What you won't get is QBs who have proven they can produce GWD. They also will not be able to produce better against an NFL playoff caliber defense than they did against college defenses. Easy ceiling to measure coming out of college and it will transfer to the NFL every time.

There are a list of these QBs and several of them are not starting in the NFL or not on an NFL roster atm. Meanwhile,  the scouts fall in love with these big school QBs who have gone untested with the coaches, defenses, OLs, and 5 star skill position recruits that surround them leading to blow out wins and few opportunities to prove they have the foundation to be an NFL QB.

Heinicke was that QB with the Panthers. He was buried under Cam, Allen, and Grier. If you looked at Heinicke's college success in GWD, you would have seen he was better than Allen and Grier. He never got his chance with the Panthers. He should have been given 5 to 6 starts before he was tossed. If he couldn't produce GWD, then move to the next. Kyle Allen could not produce GWD. His wins were anchored by the defense and running game.

It's not difficult to find the QBs that will be successful. The difficult part is developing an organization that stops shopping for show ponies, focuses on clutch production and turnovers in college, values footwork in the pocket over everything else, and most importantly demonstrates patience and decisiveness in allowing these QBs their opportunities without falling in love with them and giving them 32 games to show a glimpse of success on the field (Lawrence and Fields).

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GOAT said:

what are yalls thoughts on these two situations?

we have the Jets who drafted Wilson and seem to prefer an perform better with a 5th round cast away. tons of users on here would've done terrible things to draft Wilson, and now look - replaced by some dude that was never on anyone's radar.

then we have the niners, traded their picks away to get Lance who under performed and got injured, now Jimmy's hurt and this Brock kid (THE LAST FUGING PICK IN THE DRAFT) comes out and helps them get a win. Shanahan and Kittle are raving about this dude and I'm getting the vibe he's about to take over.

What does this have to do with us? Well you have two teams that both did whatever they could to draft "their guys" in the top 3 pics and voila. Replaced by late rounders. Lot's of talk about tanking and drafting a first rounder but damn, it's really dicey out there.

What does that have to tell you? What are your thoughts on this?

Good topic.  White had a great first game and a not-so-great 2nd game.  Purdy really shined in Shanahan's offense. 

As @Pejorative Miscreantpointed out your best "talent" traditionally is at the top of draft but sometimes there are gems.  There are several youtube videos on believing White might be the answer in NY. It will be interesting to see if he'll be figured out after a couple of weeks of film.

Purdy has so many weapons I think any QB in SF would do well but make no mistake he came in and played well, which is what a back up is supposed to do.   I've also heard that Shanahan and Lynch really like this kid.  I find it quite funny that a rookie "Mr. Irrelevant" played better than the QB that SF traded 3 No. 1 for, had a full camp as the #1 QB and had one year understudy with Shanahan offense.

There are several "Lynch apologetics" out there that want to make excuses why Lance looked so bad in his debut.  Why didn't Purdy have issues?  He seemed to do well.  This ought to be fun.

I think you have to have good scouts to recommend some of these QBs that teams find.  We had Heinicke and let him go far too soon.  He's playing better than any QB since Cam.  

Once again, great topic.  Blow off all the poo's you'll get because those that do that are simple minded. They cannot see that every player drafted in the NFL is talented, athletic and deserving of a selection. Lower round picks don't usually last too long but every year there is some late round pick that turns out to be a Pro Bowler. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

You are looking at a 50% split whether you choose a 1st rounder a QB chosen outside the 1st round and undrafted QBs.

First rounders will always get more opportunities. Non-first rounders will always play with more of an edge and nothing to lose.

Most QBs will be decent game managers. Most project QBs will fail. What you won't get is QBs who have proven they can produce GWD. They also will not be able to produce better against an NFL playoff caliber defense than they did against college defenses. Easy ceiling to measure coming out of college and it will transfer to the NFL every time.

There are a list of these QBs and several of them are not starting in the NFL or not on an NFL roster atm. Meanwhile,  the scouts fall in love with these big school QBs who have gone untested with the coaches, defenses, OLs, and 5 star skill position recruits that surround them leading to blow out wins and few opportunities to prove they have the foundation to be an NFL QB.

Heinicke was that QB with the Panthers. He was buried under Cam, Allen, and Grier. If you looked at Heinicke's college success in GWD, you would have seen he was better than Allen and Grier. He never got his chance with the Panthers. He should have been given 5 to 6 starts before he was tossed. If he couldn't produce GWD, then move to the next. Kyle Allen could not produce GWD. His wins were anchored by the defense and running game.

It's not difficult to find the QBs that will be successful. The difficult part is developing an organization that stops shopping for show ponies, focuses on clutch production and turnovers in college, values footwork in the pocket over everything else, and most importantly demonstrates patience and decisiveness in allowing these QBs their opportunities without falling in love with them and giving them 32 games to show a glimpse of success on the field (Lawrence and Fields).

Outstanding reply.  

I spit bullets thinking what would have happened if we had just kept Heinicke.  He has that Delhomme passion that we used to love.  I used to live in Norfolk Virginia where he played college football at ODU but back then they didn't have a football program.    He's a winner.  His Wikepedia profile shows he never had a losing season at ODU (6-6 was his lowest record) and is the 18 player to throw for 10,000 yds and rush for 1,000 in a career. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Outstanding reply.  

I spit bullets thinking what would have happened if we had just kept Heinicke.  He has that Delhomme passion that we used to love.  I used to live in Norfolk Virginia where he played college football at ODU but back then they didn't have a football program.    He's a winner.  His Wikepedia profile shows he never had a losing season at ODU (6-6 was his lowest record) and is the 18 player to throw for 10,000 yds and rush for 1,000 in a career. 

This is typical. Heinicke was tested in college. Mayfield was not tested; he was protected by a big program. Ohio St QBs experience this all the time and never develop in college what is needed to win in the NFL. Every loss a QB has in college is an opportunity. Any QB in the NFL will lose more than they win when given this opportunity. In college you can have QBs who have more wins than losses like Desmond Ridder at Cinncy, Tom Brady at Michigan, and Grayson McCall at Coastal. It is very similar to batters in baseball. You want a .400 hitter and not a .100 hitter.

They may look awkward and lanky. They may come in last at the combine. They will pull out the wins when the rest of the team and coaching staff fail.

I believe you should give a proven college QB 4 losses in the NFL. If they produce 1 GWD, you give them another 4 losses. Once they fall below 20% GWD, you move on to the next QB. You will quickly find that QB that will be able to produce 30% GWD and win in the playoffs. Currently, there are about 14 QBs that are able to maintain a 30% GWD. Only 4 to 6 of them are able to maintain 40% GWD. 7 active QBs have won the SB. Aaron Rodgers and Joe Flacco are the only 2 SB winning QBs who are below 30% GWD.

A team could never draft a QB and only cycle through undrafted QBs who have proven this in college. They would find multiple QBs who could win in the playoffs and win a SB. The scouts and front offices miss big on players all the time because of the way they evaluate athletes over winners. You build a team around winners. You supercharge the winners with athletes.

Joe Gibbs and Bill Walsh were the masters of understanding the true value of a QB. Neither of them drafted a QB in the 1st round, and they would trade away their 1st round picks for more draft capital in later rounds.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

The scouts and front offices miss big on players all the time because of the way they evaluate athletes over winners. You build a team around winners. You supercharge the winners with athletes.

I keep going back to Jake but Jake wasn't the most talented QB in the NFL but he was a winner.  (A lot of fun to watch as well).  You can teach skills but you can't teach that pressure of a GWD.  You have it or you don't.   

Whatever round we draft in I hope we find that QB with balls of steel that can handle the pressure of a GWD. 

BTW, I am shocked that Rodgers is below 30% GWD. 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike White is a poo QB and Purdy has literally just started one game. You root for a team that had Kyle Allen and Sam Darnold start 4-0 and 3-0 respectively. Once film gets out on these lads it will be all over.

 Also OP you could have just said that "I think we should just take a late round QB because those are as good as first round QBs". Its a pretty common cope around these parts.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...