Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Say what you want….


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, rayzor said:

i think for this year it's fine. i think even going forward it will still be good to have a team that can bully with the run the way we do. 

the problem is that we don't have much of a choice. we certainly don't have a QB that can help us out in a shootout so that's definitely going to have to be addressed, along with a pass catching TE or two.  i don't think we need a personality change as a team, tbh. i like the pounding culture. we just need to add to it, add the capability to kill through the air if needed. 

but i have to admit loving watch that seattle defense get wore out because we keep battering away. adding more of an air game to it can only thin out the defense more. i mean the way we're loading up at the line with big bodies, it's only a matter of time before defenses start stacking the box and shutting us down. we don't have much to spread the ball and them out. 

if wilkes can keep this aggressive nature going and building, i really don't care what our philosophy is otherwise. more than half the battle is getting players bought in to whatever mindset you are trying to instill. if it's aggressive, situationally aware, and disciplined (which this team seems to be), it will go along way in being successful.

i was big on getting some offensive brain to make us one of those flashy offenses that will pile on the points, but i'm really warming up to the idea of wiles being that guy. Just get him a better OC and QB and TE and i think we're set.

This to me is the key part here. In the 2022 NFL, we should be beyond one-dimensional smashmouth football...it should be punishing football where opponents are demoralized by the offense on the ground AND through the air, plus a lights-out, opportunistic D and special teams. We already had this in 2015. Again, that's why we need a QB that can impose his will on a defense to go along with a run game that threatens to. We should be able to exploit all their attacks, not just bullying on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2022 at 10:43 PM, Shocker said:

if Darnold keeps playing mistake free football and moving this offense look out

 

On 12/11/2022 at 11:21 PM, Fright said:

If we can keep getting smart play out of Darnold, we could be a legit threat if we sneak in. 

Pardon the bump, fellas...

 

But may I point out that Sam had one throw at the start of the game(i believe) that was almost picked and made a poor decision in forcing a ball to Tremble who was covered in the endzone instead of running it in himself (he had wide-open space)?

It wasn't exactly mistake-free football from him.

He was fortunate he wasn't picked (That could've set the tone for the whole game right there) and we lost points on the latter. 

 

For those here saying we need a QB, yeah you damn right we need a QB.

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm pretty sure this would be his first choice.

His love for the Panthers is clear, so yes.

My point is  that his success so far, and especially if we go 3-1 to finish, and he is an available black HC who became a coach of the ear candidate down the stretch.  If I had an opening I would sure put him on the invite list  (maybe not Arizona, lol!) for an interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

His love for the Panthers is clear, so yes.

My point is  that his success so far, and especially if we go 3-1 to finish, and he is an available black HC who became a coach of the ear candidate down the stretch.  If I had an opening I would sure put him on the invite list  (maybe not Arizona, lol!) for an interview.

I'd agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...