Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer Burned us, but he can fix it.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

there are roughly 20 guys in the nfl that are double digit sack players

 

Burns is a goddamn liability in the run game (as witnessed yesterday and against pitt) so he is essentially a one trick pony no matter what his age is.  3 picks in the top 40 he is most certainly not worth especially considering we are about to pay him as the top end in the league

He isnt a run stopper. He isnt even really a defense end. your comparing him to guys who are 270-280. hes honestly a 3-4 edge and thats what he projected to be. is that his fault you use him at end to stop the run? no.  athleticism is always valuable. 1 trick or not its a damn good trick. Maybe  there are 20 guys in the league with double digit sacks but thats 20 out of 32 teams including defensive tackles thats rare 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Chad_Cota said:

Agree with that burns should have been dealt, but Fields is the most overrated QB this season. He can run, but his team struggles to put up 20 point per game. 

Sure, but you're totally discounting the fact that his team has a bad offensive line in terms of pass blocking, and unless you just really follow the NFL, you don't know any of his receivers because they're nothing to write home about. You may not know any of his skill players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The case for doing what it takes to acquire a top QB who can will the team to winning is made right here. That's what the league sees, not a "as long as he doesn't mess it up" game manager QB and all the highs and lows of that.

Much rather a QB that we have confidence in to win us games rather than hope and crossed fingers.

you can do that without losing the second most important position in the game. you got a haul for CMC your already picking top 10. should be very doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so long ago, Tepper took the lead role in trying to recruit a sexual deviant to be the face of the Panthers franchise.  That, and signing Rhule, an NFL novice, to a 7 year contract based on meatballs.  I don't need to see anything else to realize Tepper would be better off leaving the crucial team decisions to NFL executives that are proven winners.  In 2019 his choice for HC came down to Rhule or Mike McCarthy.  Shouldn't have been a hard choice.  Several years later the Panthers are still looking for a HC, while the Cowboys are in serious contention for a Super Bowl.

Tepper was busy trying to be the smartest owner in the room when he should have just hired the best HC available and let the guy do his job.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From everything I've read Fitterer remains an enigma, mostly because we don't know how much of a role he's played in this team's personnel decisions.  With that in mind, if a HC with a winning record shows interest in coaching the Panthers, I wouldn't hesitate to kick Fitterer to the curb (if that's what's required to seal the deal).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I’m in the minority here,  it I like what fitt has done so far. 
 

I haven’t agreed with all his decisions. The two main disagreements I had was picking up Darnold’s option and turning down the Burns trade. Jury’s still out on the latter, but I probably would have pulled the trigger. Still, I get why he wanted to keep a young pass rushing specialist as a core piece. 
 

I think his drafts have been pretty solid. No way I pick fields over Horn. Shut down corner is tremendously important these days. Fields is a fantasy standout due to his running, but he’s 5-20 with 21 interceptions and 28 fumbles in less than 2 seasons. He may get better, but he would not have been developed by rhule and would have been a wasted pick. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

He isnt a run stopper. He isnt even really a defense end. your comparing him to guys who are 270-280. hes honestly a 3-4 edge and thats what he projected to be. is that his fault you use him at end to stop the run? no.  athleticism is always valuable. 1 trick or not its a damn good trick. Maybe  there are 20 guys in the league with double digit sacks but thats 20 out of 32 teams including defensive tackles thats rare 

Alright cool.  Based on what you just described burns as, do you think he is worth more then 2 firsts and a second?   

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Not so long ago, Tepper took the lead role in trying to recruit a sexual deviant to be the face of the Panthers franchise.  That, and signing Rhule, an NFL novice, to a 7 year contract based on meatballs.  I don't need to see anything else to realize Tepper would be better off leaving the crucial team decisions to NFL executives that are proven winners.  In 2019 his choice for HC came down to Rhule or Mike McCarthy.  Shouldn't have been a hard choice.  Several years later the Panthers are still looking for a HC, while the Cowboys are in serious contention for a Super Bowl.

Tepper was busy trying to be the smartest owner in the room when he should have just hired the best HC available and let the guy do his job.

To be fair he did have the best talent evaluator in football giving him advice.  So there's that. 

I remember distinctly seeing this board rail on anyone who mentioned McCarthy as a ppssibly head coaching candidate.  If anyone even suggested we should consider interviewing him it was drowned out with how they should get Rhule because he was the hot name. 

This board = Dumbasses.

that 70s show lol GIF by IFC

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is where I'm glad you're not the GM.

All the picks was a bit much, it was an exaggeration. However, all you guys keep making this more difficult than it needs to be. Until the QB situation is fixed, we're going nooooowhere. 

It's the KISS principle - keep it simple stupid. 

Fix the QB situation first and the rest will fall into place. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I am of the camp that it's completely impossible to determine what percentage of these moves he was responsible for or what percentage input he had. I know that contractually he was Rhule’s assistant GM.

I have a healthy dose of skepticism about Fitterer but from Oct. 11 onward all moves are 100% his. He doesn't have a GM boss, he is now the GM. So no Rhule to hide behind or share credit with. He is the man.

So I say let him have this offseason to see what it looks like. There is ample time to break out the pitchforks and torches.

Fair take.

Currently Im 50/50 on finessererer. I do believe Rhule had full control and for a few moves allowed finnesererer full control. Just guessing about which, i feel the QBs ones fall on Rhule. 

Plus after herniay gave the fan-base hernias, it shouldnt be asking much for the next GM to be/do better. I think most have a unfair expectation for what is a NFL GM is. example; drafting-wise, what equals a good-to-great draft class....believe it or not its just 2 starters and one super-sub/STer. Free ageny- its even a wiiiider net that must be thrown with "hit" rate being something like 20%. It feels to me most fans think a NFL GM must draft and any signed free agents the "hit" rate needs to be nearly 100%.....and they non-stop harp on "one" failed pick or FA.

In closing- I do also feel Rhule while still in full control, heavily leaned on Finessererererer come draft time duties. Results form the last two combined classes have been above average returns and most of it was with Rhule screwing up the development of many of them. ie Christ, TMJ, Franklin, Tremble, etc. 

I got no strong opinion on keeping him(feels like tepper 100% will) or if it was a total rebuild with a new GM/scouts. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

To be fair he did have the best talent evaluator in football giving him advice.  So there's that. 

Haha, so true.  Marty Hurney the genius.  Should've included this gem in my reasons Tepper should leave the crucial decisions to others with a proven track record of winning at the NFL level.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

To be fair he did have the best talent evaluator in football giving him advice.  So there's that. 

I remember distinctly seeing this board rail on anyone who mentioned McCarthy as a ppssibly head coaching candidate.  If anyone even suggested we should consider interviewing him it was drowned out with how they should get Rhule because he was the hot name. 

This board = Dumbasses.

that 70s show lol GIF by IFC

 

I didnt want Rhule(tired to bump those threads, but anything over 2 years cannot......) nor did I want fat mike........ In alllllllllllll my brilliant thinking and looking over alllllll the potential coaches, I came to the decision that Josh McDaniels was the best choice....

1671583286064308.thumb.png.1205d7e1e2082d7943101c73a8d025c9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

All the picks was a bit much, it was an exaggeration. However, all you guys keep making this more difficult than it needs to be. Until the QB situation is fixed, we're going nooooowhere. 

It's the KISS principle - keep it simple stupid. 

Fix the QB situation first and the rest will fall into place. 

I'm not convinced Stroud fixes anything.

If he fell to us, okay. Trading extra picks for him? That's a no.

People lament us not being bold, but we have been. Hell, we were extremely bold a few years back. Specifically, when we hired a college coach, gave him a massive contract and full roster control.

And now we're here...again.

I don't really give a sh-t about "bold". I want smart.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...