Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

9th pick set in stone


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, AceBoogie said:

At this point I’d throw in my grandmother to stop this cycle of washed up and never was at QB

Have you seen how the last few have worked out? denver wilson, rams goff, in a way philly wertz, 49ers lance....... sounds like a great way to piss away picks.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

I’m getting on the Johnston train.

See what you have in Corral, if he flames out, we’re in position for Caleb, Maye, Ewers, or Penix. 

No...we are never in position because We are NOT that bad. We pick where we pick every year for a reason.  Its the same trend every year, do you not get tired of saying this? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

No...we are never in position because We are NOT that bad. We pick where we pick every year for a reason.  Its the same trend every year, do you not get tired of saying this? 

Which qb that’ll be available for us to trade up for is worth 3 firsts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

The only game I watched Richardson play in was vs Kentucky and he was god awful. I was legit confused of why he was a 1st round prospect. Maybe I caught a bad game..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Thompcat said:

Nobody has said that Richardson is a finished product, he's raw and has a very high ceiling 

That’s what they said about Malik Willis and he was one of the worst QB’s I’ve ever seen. And unless he improves by 1000% he’ll never be anything. Gotta be careful taking “potential” guys. Esp when their best QB trait is athleticism 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...