Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

These former, already seasoned head coaches are plug and play. They don't need to assemble an experienced staff because they already have the contacts, guys who want to work them.

It's not a guy "trying to figure it out". They've already figured it out. They're coming to install their already proven systems.

We know your affinity for the "new hot" but if your OC doesn't prove to be a good head executive you've just set the team back AGAIN and your top players and free agents won't take us seriously.

Harbaugh, Payton, Reich give us instant leadership and head management acumen which we can't assume a fresh OC/DC may/may not have. Crap shoot. We can't afford that being so close to bottom feeder territory due to prior mistakes. 

 

 

Harbaugh 2023

Ppl don’t realize the adjustment and learning period for new head coaches “normally “ can be a couple years.. 

how to run practice assembly a staff game time decision are all learning curb items..

That you won’t have to deal with when your coach has already went thru that..

not to mention the relationship and network they have with other experienced coaches they can bring in day 1 on staff..

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Mr. Scot, it would save all of us a lot of time if you simply stated you don't like Payton. Instead of arguing in circles, or coming up with some way anything positive said about Payton has a fault to it lol.

I don't like him, but that's not why I wouldn't want him hired.

I don't like what we'd have to give up for him.

I don't like that he'd want full control.

I don't like the idea of hiring a guy who was successful elsewhere and hoping that he has the same success in an entirely different system without the quarterback that helped make him.

And I don't like the idea of Tepper "swinging for the fences" again rather than taking a more measured approach.

That's my reasoning.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I don't like him, but that's not why I wouldn't want him hired.

I don't like what we'd have to give up for him.

I don't like that he'd want full control.

I don't like the idea of hiring a guy who was successful elsewhere and hoping that he has the same success in an entirely different system without the quarterback that helped make him.

And I don't like the idea of Tepper "swinging for the fences" again rather than taking a more measured approach.

That's my reasoning.

Agreed.. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I need this to be very clear to Payton ppl here.. 

This is a he Saints plan to rebuild.. They’re whole thing to have a fast rebuild is using Payton levarge to get assets.. They are going to try a screw us even more..

Payton has the leverage. All he has to do is say take the deal or I’m going back to tv and you get nothing. Il come back when my deal expires. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The returns just kept diminishing.

And again, Parcells Is a guy who insisted on having full control, just as Peyton would. Yet the only team he actually won a Super Bowl with was the one where he didn't have it.

 

I'll give you that, his staff in NY was an Allstar coaching staff too. He just hated the GM of the giants.

 

However any of those three situations would be a vast improvement from where the Panthers have been since 2018 or so.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Payton has the leverage. All he has to do is say take the deal or I’m going back to tv and you get nothing. Il come back when my deal expires. 

I don’t know what Payton loyalties are.. Him and Loomis are close and if the 2 1st round things are true why wouldn’t he wait this out another year where they can’t asked for that level of compensation?? It obviously hurts the new team right?? And his abilities to get talent right??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't like him, but that's not why I wouldn't want him hired.

I don't like what we'd have to give up for him.

I don't like that he'd want full control.

I don't like the idea of hiring a guy who was successful elsewhere and hoping that he has the same success in an entirely different system without the quarterback that helped make him.

And I don't like the idea of Tepper "swinging for the fences" again rather than taking a more measured approach.

That's my reasoning.

Ok, fair.

But what if the team, hopefully employed by men and women educated to be in that posotion, think Sean IS the answer? What if they think giving up assets is worth it, think full control is OK due to Payton's plan, think he will be successful, and believe in his plan for QB? Will you just call them idiots?

This is more a case that you're an armchair GM/HC type, like most of us here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I need this to be very clear to Payton ppl here.. 

This is a he Saints plan to rebuild.. They’re whole thing to have a fast rebuild is using Payton levarge to get assets.. They are going to try a screw us even more..

Not a Payton person, don't really care if its him but also wouldn't throw myself off of a bridge if we do hire him like others seem.  But you could play devil's advocate with this comment.  Perhaps we are using them to rebuild?  We are a competent coach and a couple of players away from dominating the south for years.  With the current players, if we had an above average coach we could have started that dynasty...this year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My humble prediction, I may be as close to nailing it as Mel Kipers draft picks. 

Houston: DeMeco Ryans

Denver: Sean Payton

Carolina: Shane Steichen

i see a slight possibility for Wilkes in Carolina, but I think Tepper is hell bent on offensive coach. I hope I’m wrong. Defense still wins championships. If Tepper moves off of Wilkes as HC I see him trying to offer him a position to placate the fanbase. Just my thoughts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Ppl don’t realize the adjustment and learning period for new head coaches “normally “ can be a couple years.. 

how to run practice assembly a staff game time decision are all learning curb items..

That you won’t have to deal with when your coach has already went thru that..

not to mention the relationship and network they have with other experienced coaches they can bring in day 1 on staff..

Can't stress those points enough.

They'd better damn well call Harbaugh and cover their ass because this Payton stuff doesn't seem sincere and IF Harbaugh is given the Panthers HC job the NFC will be in fear and whatever "rebuilding" New Orleans thought they'd be doing would be pounded into dust.

Harbaugh wants the Panthers HC job he has the best record college/NFL than any of the coaches in this cycle. It should have been his job the minute his people got in touch with US. Sincere.

A smart David Tepper would have stopped the "coaching search" at that very moment. Harbaughs credentials speak for themselves. Harbaughs results at all levels of the game is unmatched.

They desperately need Harbaugh in BofA to fix this franchise and it's something he WANTS to do. One of the best coaches in football who formerly wore a Panthers uniform wants to coach YOUR team.

 

Smh.

 

Harbaugh 2023

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I don’t know what Payton loyalties are.. Him and Loomis are close and if the 2 1st round things are true why wouldn’t he wait this out another year where they can’t asked for that level of compensation?? It obviously hurts the new team right?? And his abilities to get talent right??

I think those guys are playing us. Laughing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Ok, fair.

But what if the team, hopefully employed by men and women educated to be in that posotion, think Sean IS the answer? What if they think giving up assets is worth it, think full control is OK due to Payton's plan, think he will be successful, and believe in his plan for QB? Will you just call them idiots?

This is more a case that you're an armchair GM/HC type, like most of us here.

It's been reported that Payton wants full control, and Joe Person erson went as far as to say that the current group of football people (including Fitterer and Morgan) would likely be looking for work after Payton got in and hired his own people.

If he's the hire it's gonna be a Tepper decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...