Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Chargers didn’t trade him because they didn’t think he was good enough

He tore his shoulder and was at a pay day.   They were scared of him not recovering and being tied to a huge deal.  So they offered him a heavy incentive deal which Brees didn’t take. 

Healthy, Brees was Brees.

Doesn't change the fact that the Chargers lost faith in Brees whether it was performance based or injury based. It is still safe to say that Brees went on to have a long healthy career. He didn't miss many games.  Payton managed that perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cavscout said:

Giving the Saints 2 first round picks for Payton is potentially giving them CJ Stroud and Marvin Harrison Jr. 

We’re not picking high enough to land Harrison next year if Payton is our coach. The Saints might be with their own pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, philit99 said:

Yep and I don’t like drafting quality prospects and waste them on shitty coaches. We need both and a seasoned veteran coach don’t grow on trees, so I would rather give up a few prospects now and be in a better position to coach next years class.

I agree with this, I just feel there are good coaches available this hiring cycle that would cost nothing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Whenever people wanna talk bad about Brees, it’s because he was a Payton system QB.  And when people wanna talk bad about Payton it’s because he had a great QB.  Got it.

Sometimes a coach & QB just click and it's impossible to duplicate it for either side.  

Curious to who Peyton thinks could be his next partner in the current QB landscape.  It's pretty icky.  For some reason, could see him having an interest in Derek Carr though.  He seems like a guy that could really do well in his system.

Here's a wild scenario:

HOU gets Payton, HOU trades (Using Pick 12) and gets their 2nd Carr, they're able to use Pick 2 on Anderson or Carter.  

1-Bears-Anderson

2-HOU-Carter

We suddenly have a much better chance at a top QB...

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name a great coach who never had a good QB. Name a great QB who never had a great coach.

To me, the best coaches today are in Seattle (Pete won with Wilson, who is a different QB now), SF (Garrapolo?  Purdy?) and maybe (too early to tell) Detroit and Miami.  They won despite their QBs. 

Payton had one of the best of all time and he had a good GM.  He won 1 super bowl.  Should he have done better? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Name a great coach who never had a good QB. Name a great QB who never had a great coach.

To me, the best coaches today are in Seattle (Pete won with Wilson, who is a different QB now), SF (Garrapolo?  Purdy?) and maybe (too early to tell) Detroit and Miami.  They won despite their QBs. 

Payton had one of the best of all time and he had a good GM.  He won 1 super bowl.  Should he have done better? 

No he shouldn't have done better. Would prefer that he hadn't done as well as he did.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Name a great coach who never had a good QB. Name a great QB who never had a great coach.

To me, the best coaches today are in Seattle (Pete won with Wilson, who is a different QB now), SF (Garrapolo?  Purdy?) and maybe (too early to tell) Detroit and Miami.  They won despite their QBs. 

Payton had one of the best of all time and he had a good GM.  He won 1 super bowl.  Should he have done better? 

After the Super Bowl in 09', he made it the conference championship 1 time (2018)

1 conf champ appearance in 11 years with Brees in his prime.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

After the Super Bowl in 09', he made it the conference championship 1 time (2018)

1 conf champ appearance in 11 years with Brees in his prime.  

That is what I am saying.  Cam was QB for less time and did better (except was robbed in the Super Bowl, but should have won that if it were not for a bad RT (Remmers) and OC--(Shula).  Just speculating for fun--who knows?  Payton got robbed by the refs one year--maybe 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...