Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper clearly wants to change the Panthers identity


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

So basically we ran the South for 3 years..even with Sean Payton on the other side...and didn't Wilks just sweep the Saints, I mean Payton gone but Rhule couldnt even do that.

 

You win your divison first. Wilks rn is the best coach in the Nfc south...point blank period.

that might be true but our division is a combined 29-39, so is that really saying muhc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

1 year. I bet the fans turn then because it would really be like his 2nd year more than his first year. If we were not winning at the end of next year it would get rough for him. There would be no Rhule curve next year to  hide behind.

I don't think it matters and even Tepper knows the stands would remain empty if Wilks is rehired. He amps up the players really well and not the customers which is a problem the players don't see or care about. Tepper sends out questionnaires regularly so he probably knows the temp of the customer base at this point. 

excuse me sir...as a die hard fan who refuse to pay for my PSL this year bc of the product I was about to go all in for the Pitts game...just because the feeling was back. If we won that game....BOA sold out for it's last one guarantee.

 

Wilks is a fan of the Carolina Panthers...he is us...let that sink in.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

So basically we ran the South for 3 years..even with Sean Payton on the other side...and didn't Wilks just sweep the Saints, I mean Payton gone but Rhule couldnt even do that.

 

You win your divison first. Wilks rn is the best coach in the Nfc south...point blank period.

I don't know that I'd say we ran the south for 3 years.  That 2014 season we had to win the last 4 games to win it with a losing record.  We had a 6 game losing streak prior to that.  And the only team we swept that year was Tampa Bay, splitting with the Aints and Failcons. 

Edited by Gregg S
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Winning record and playoffs. This was his rookie year. Most new coaches do better year two. So winning record and in this division playoffs are very possible. 

This was not Wilks rookie year. He went 3-13 in Arizona where he coached the team to a worse offense and defense than the year prior so they fired him after giving him a four year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

One season 3-13. That isn’t experience you want to have in your potential head coach. 

He was set up to fail...Kliff n Murray...

But he learned from that...hence the full control he said he wanted from go in his last interview when asked what he learned from his time in AZ

 

He said the Head Coach...not Gm..not owner..but Head Coach sets the tone for the BUILDING

Edited by GuessWhosBack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want an identity change other than from losers to winners. 

Still want a hard nosed stingy defense (still waiting on that) and an offense that can run it down the opponents throat at will (we might have the beginnings of this). When they can't we light them up through the air (still waiting on that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

excuse me sir...as a die hard fan who refuse to pay for my PSL this year bc of the product I was about to go all in for the Pitts game...just because the feeling was back. If we won that game....BOA sold out for it's last one guarantee.

 

Wilks is a fan of the Carolina Panthers...he is us...let that sink in.. 

I couldn't give away tickets to the Lions game and that was to people who like the cold. Let that sink in...

It goes both ways hard with Wilks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

how many of those interims had prior HC experience???

Mike Mularkey was Tennessee's interim HC in 2015 after two previous HC stints with Buffalo (2004-2005) and Jacksonville (2012). He went 18-14 (.563 win %) in 2 seasons with one playoff appearance before being fired after the 2017 season. 

Doug Marrone was Jacksonville's interim HC at the end of 2016 after being the Bills HC from 2013-2014. He went 22-42 (.343 win %) in 4 seasons with the Jags with one playoff appearance before being fired after the 2020 season.

 

Edited by UNCrules2187
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

I couldn't give away tickets to the Lions game and that was to people who like the cold. Let that sink in...

It goes both ways hard with Wilks. 

but we lost the week before so of course who would want to waste their time in the cold to a meaningless game....but i bet you any amount of dollar if that last tampa game was in Charlotte it wouldve been sold out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players want to play for Wilks!

Also the players, let’s let a Trubisky led Steelers team walk the ball right down our throats for 3 hours 

The division tried gifting us a playoff spot but Wilks and co. let Brady and Evans absolutely torch us

Wilks and these guys had their chance and they didn’t do anything with it. Why in the hell would anyone want more of this?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

One thing I notice the loud pro Wilks fans don't want to talk about much if at all is that Bengals loss. For all the positive talk of Wilks if things go bad that's what we can expect.

The Bengals loss and even the win vs the Saints to end the year. Can anyone claim that was good coaching? We looked worse in those two games than the 4 or 5 this year that Rhule coached. And thats the scary part of Wilks. The lows were actually lower than what Rhule did this year. And we acknowledge he was a bum. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...