Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

The article says this was just implemented by the League in October of 2022 and it’s the first hiring cycle since it’s been in place.

They will make her do the training, publicly embarrass the franchise like it’s some well-established policy…even though it’s not, and will keep it moving. 

It does speak poorly about how Tepper runs the show, but not as shocking as the headline was meant to be.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple pages in and some mouth breathers showing full face lol. These trainings, though some of y’all roll your eyes, are important. For every slackjaw that calls it woke and sounds the alarm on themselves, there’s some good to be gleaned and we learn. 
 

There’s a few here who are very much signaling how they would be behaving towards Ruby B right about now. 
 

Hopefully our ownership takes this for what it is, and makes the efforts to learn about diversity, equity and inclusion. 
 

poo me now F-150 PFPs

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CRA said:

lol.  Oh we did “other training”.   What clowns.  Just say you didn’t do it and will get it done.  Tepper sounding like my middle schooler. 

 

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

It's the same as "I did my own research" lol

So it was reported due to that response that she did “other training” that the NFL won’t be able to fine us as long as she gets certified. 
 

The phrasing was used to avoid legal issues/penalty.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

 

So it was reported due to that response that she did “other training” that the NFL won’t be able to fine us as long as she gets certified. 
 

The phrasing was used to avoid legal issues/penalty.

Yeah you have people on Twitter claiming they are gonna take away the 9th pick…this really isn’t a big deal like setting bounties on players or something 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayflip said:

A couple pages in and some mouth breathers showing full face lol. These trainings, though some of y’all roll your eyes, are important. For every slackjaw that calls it woke and sounds the alarm on themselves, there’s some good to be gleaned and we learn. 
 

There’s a few here who are very much signaling how they would be behaving towards Ruby B right about now. 
 

Hopefully our ownership takes this for what it is, and makes the efforts to learn about diversity, equity and inclusion. 
 

poo me now F-150 PFPs

Or... and hear me out on this... people have a different opinion than you. O_O Scary, I know. Please don't bring the whole "different opinion = racist" thing into conversation against people you don't know. It shuts down the entire dialogue and only continues to further divide. If you disagree with someone, say what you disagree with and try and help them understand it from your perspective. People are more willing to listen than you might imagine.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jayflip said:

A couple pages in and some mouth breathers showing full face lol. These trainings, though some of y’all roll your eyes, are important. For every slackjaw that calls it woke and sounds the alarm on themselves, there’s some good to be gleaned and we learn. 
 

There’s a few here who are very much signaling how they would be behaving towards Ruby B right about now. 
 

Hopefully our ownership takes this for what it is, and makes the efforts to learn about diversity, equity and inclusion. 
 

poo me now F-150 PFPs

As someone who serves in a DEI committee.. the actual trainings still have a long way to go. The current program is struggling to achieve set goals that are actionable in a performant sense. A lot of companies are struggling with rolling out these courses and yielding results from them. 
 

right now it’s in its early stages, so it’s understandable that the results have not changed standards or created new environments in a corporate atmosphere. What it has created is a ton of protections for individuals who know they don’t have to do their jobs (silent quitters) at expected performance levels.

 

this is probably a tinderbox convo. I am just calling out that DEI has a long way to go before it can be proven to be effective.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

If you disagree with someone, say what you disagree with and try and help them understand it from your perspective. People are more willing to listen than you might imagine.

Ironically this is actually part of inclusive trainings, haha. A little different but same goal.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayflip said:

A couple pages in and some mouth breathers showing full face lol. These trainings, though some of y’all roll your eyes, are important. For every slackjaw that calls it woke and sounds the alarm on themselves, there’s some good to be gleaned and we learn. 
 

There’s a few here who are very much signaling how they would be behaving towards Ruby B right about now. 
 

Hopefully our ownership takes this for what it is, and makes the efforts to learn about diversity, equity and inclusion. 
 

poo me now F-150 PFPs

This is a type of response that shuts down all conversation and leads to nowhere and needs to stop.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

The requirement was spelled out and well communicated.  Ignoring it seems dumb.

This is what happens when someone is given a serious job with serious responsibilities and they see it as a “fun” thing to do. Details get ignored and missed. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...