Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

probably true... but EVERYONE loved Jake.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

What’s one of your core beliefs that get you shunned by the rest of the fanbase?

Here are mine. 

A) Brian Burns is overrated and will never be on the level of Peppers, Johnson, Rucker. Maybe Addison. 
 

B) Had John Fox been retained he would have had the same and likely more success than Rivera. 
 

C) I never really liked Christian McCaffrey. Was a playmaker but he really made our offense predictable. People rooting for him with the 49ers make me eye roll.

We will be stuck in mediocrity for the next X amount of years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

These aren't opinions, they're facts.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see the comments daily.

 

Some guys brought up Cam not jumping on the ball in the game thread because Josh Johnson didn't dive on the ball.

We never see Luke Kuechly slander. Never see TD slander. Hell you don't even see Smitty slander and he was a ticking time bomb.

So what's your point? We have CMC slander too. We're allowed to not like players. And just to make you boil, mine is ... Cam Newton was not an elite QB. He was only very good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GOAT said:

tanking does not exist. it's a theory created by fans when they think their team is losing on purpose to get a good draft spot. teams don't tank, these guys all have to play / coach their hardest to earn their checks / contract increases / job security. trading key players for draft picks is not tanking, it's smart financially and helps rebuild the team.

We just need to change the name of the term. ZERO players will ever tank (unless they are gambling). Most coaches will not tank. I'd imagine many owners/GMs would like the team to tank but they can't control that. What we as fans are actually thinking when we say "tank" is that we are 100% ok if the team loses out, and we hope they lose out. We don't actually think/hope they throw a game. So ... we just need to come up with a new name for what we've be calling tanking. IOWL (I'm ok with losing) lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...