Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don’t think I want us to trade up for any of the “top” Qb’s

Draft best player available.

If we have to have a Qb in this draft like most are suggesting.
I wanted Hooker based on his specs, and he is from Greensboro. I know I’m being a homer.. (I just can’t stand Alabama or Ohio State and hope they loose every year.)

Since most scouts always assume a QB from Alabama , or Ohio State are the next great. I wanted to look at their and size comparison to others.

Now we know specs don’t really say if this guy is a legend in the making. However we know most scouts have an ideal size they look for. 

Richardson is 6' 4" 230 Runs 4.4 

Hendon Hooker 6’ 4” 222 4.7

C j Stroud. 6’2” 215   Runs 4.7

Bryce Young 5’ 10” 194  runs 4.52 


compared to our

Cam Newton 6’ 5” 245 ran a 4.6 

compared to others

Josh Allen 6’ 5” 247 ran  4.7

Patrick Mahomes  6’ 2” 225 ran  4.8

Joe Burrow 6’ 4” 220  ran 4.7

If specs were A true know it all, then we should definitely stay away from Young..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Trade down in the 1st, maybe twice to stack picks

2. Draft a O'Cyrus Torrance later in the 1st (All-Pro type Guard)

3. Draft Dalton Kincaid in the 2nd

4. Draft Zach Charbonnet in the 2nd

5. Draft Eli Ricks in the 3rd

6. Draft Jerrod Clark in the 4th or 5th

7. Re-sign Darnold

We either reach for JAG at QB, or we stack talent where we can and nab our guy once we have everyone, while also having the assets, in place. If we reach for a QB, and have to trade poo to get them again, we are right back where we've been since Cam got hurt. But everytime we trade stuff for a QB, we dig ourselves a deeper and deeper hole.

Give Darnold and Corral a shot with a real coaching staff. Build the best offensive line in the league, draft guys with elite talent in the aforementioned players, and just win baby.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

1. Trade down in the 1st, maybe twice to stack picks

2. Draft a O'Cyrus Torrance later in the 1st (All-Pro type Guard)

3. Draft Dalton Kincaid in the 2nd

4. Draft Zach Charbonnet in the 2nd

5. Draft Eli Ricks in the 3rd

6. Draft Jerrod Clark in the 4th or 5th

7. Re-sign Darnold

We either reach for JAG at QB, or we stack talent where we can and nab our guy once we have everyone, while also having the assets, in place. If we reach for a QB, and have to trade poo to get them again, we are right back where we've been since Cam got hurt. But everytime we trade stuff for a QB, we dig ourselves a deeper and deeper hole.

Give Darnold and Corral a shot with a real coaching staff. Build the best offensive line in the league, draft guys with elite talent in the aforementioned players, and just win baby.

I like it...Clayton Tune in the 4th with your mix would be a heck of a draft.Very sensible and logical approach to the current situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna get poo'd to Hell for this one, but someone has to say it:

The team did try to put an OL in front of Cam Newton. Unfortunately, injuries and Marty Hurney (who put the team in cap hell and when he came back after 3 seasons promptly drafted Greg Little) fuged it up.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, heel31ok said:

I like it...Clayton Tune in the 4th with your mix would be a heck of a draft.Very sensible and logical approach to the current situation.

Tune might be worth it but you have to remember we probably roll with two QB's and a practice squad guy who, right now, is Eason. 

 

I'd be fine with Jake Haener in the 4th. He's sort of like Heinickie in a lot of ways which isn't a bad thing for a probable back-up.

I really want Torrance though. Watched him at Louisiana. Billy Napier had some DAWGS in Lafayette and an NFL O-Line coach. Ickey, Bozeman, Torrance, and Moton would easily be one of the best lines in the league by 2024. Draft Charbonnet (6'1 225, 4.45 40), draft Kincaid out of Utah, re-sign Darnold, and maybe take Mims or the guy out of Houston in the 3rd and you've got a really, really good core of players on offense. 

I'd like to see how Darnold could do with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, amcoolio said:

Unpopular opinion

Carolina will weigh the cost of trading up, but also Aaron Rodgers or Lamar Jackson trades, and I think there is a great chance they pick Rodgers or Jackson trade if it is a similar cost

I would agree if it were only the draft picks involved.  But with Rodhers and Jackson there's also a huge guaranteed contract added on top of the picks. All is not equal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...