Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL cap going way up


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

respectfully disagree. the $8M is no different than the $10M sitting on the books for Robbie Anderson. the $5.2M could go to an important piece if you think Jackson is done after the injury. do i think they cut him, no, but i would. 

Respectfully, are you doing the math of your suggestion? That is negative 8 million dollars by this single transaction you are suggesting, and you still get the dead cap into next year as well... By cutting D-Jax... for no reason whatsover... you are accumilating 13 million dollars in dead cap over two years for 5.2million in 2023.... 

Do you see the discrepancy with that logic? There is no outcome of cutting D-Jax in 2023 that you are saving any money at all.... 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Respectfully, are you doing the math of your suggestion? That is negative 8 million dollars by this single transaction you are suggesting, and you still get the dead cap into next year as well... By cutting D-Jax... for no reason whatsover you are accumilating 13 million dollars in dead cap over two years for 5.2million in 2023.... 

Do you see the discrepancy with that logic? There is no outcome of cutting D-Jax in 2023 that you are saving any money at all.... 

you are saving 5.2M this year towards the cap this year where you are currently $9M over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7BE15F66-F016-47D0-9DEF-308B5F745E75.jpeg.751ab3ab3fce1db3b0f3aff449c60177.jpeg

It makes no sense to do anything with Jackson this offseason. Next offseason it makes sense to cut him. 

And to the crowd that thinks we have a lot of money we don’t. Restructuring and all that fun stuff is how we keep getting into this mess. Now people want to spend cap space with have in the coming years? Lucky for that crowd I do fully expect them to blow through a lot of future cap space this offseason. 

Ideally they find their damn QB of the future this offseason. Limit the amount they dip into future cap space and go heavy in next offseason if we have our QB

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cut Shaq, Elflein and Damian Wilson and immediately save 21 million 

Then they’ll extend Burns and if they want they’ll lower that 16 million dollar cap hit this year. I’d prefer them to take the biggest hit possible on that deal now though. 

We are NOT winning the Super Bowl next year so let’s keep as much cap space open for 2024. Hopefully our new QB we draft this year along with Reich will be entering season 2 and that’s when you make your push 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

we have a ton of cap room. they can restructure both moore and moton to create a ton of space. also cut shaq, possibly donte jackson, eflein, and zane gonzalez. 

Probably won’t cut Dante. But he can restructure pretty easily. Moore and Moton are the same way. 
 

Shaq is almost a lock to get cut. So is Elflein and Zane. 
 

We should be somewhere between 40-50 million.

However, you have Bozeman with a market value of 14-17 million per year and Burns with a value of 18-20 million per year. Burns is going to count 16 this year I believe but none of it is guaranteed which makes him an ideal trade target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

Probably won’t cut Dante. But he can restructure pretty easily. Moore and Moton are the same way. 
 

Shaq is almost a lock to get cut. So is Elflein and Zane. 
 

We should be somewhere between 40-50 million.

However, you have Bozeman with a market value of 14-17 million per year and Burns with a value of 18-20 million per year. Burns is going to count 16 this year I believe but none of it is guaranteed which makes him an ideal trade target.

agreed and you can probably add damien wilson to that as well. if bozeman is going to cost 15-17m per year, i move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

agreed and you can probably add damien wilson to that as well. if bozeman is going to cost 15-17m per year, i move on. 

I think he may actually settle for less. I think Burns is the one that will be difficult. We supposedly turned down 2 firsts for him. He is slated to make 16 million on 5th year option with a market value of 20 million. People think he’s going to do us a favor and takes less and more later. That’s not happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, d-dave said:

Ahh, the cap.  Where we always say "We have no cap room!"  Or "The Saints have a billion in dead cap!"  

Then FA proceeds to happen per usual... 😃

Good times!

Its the same every year. We are in cap hell, the Saints are in cap hell and wont be able to sign anyone. Turns out to not be true once the season gets closer and then repeat the cycle next offseason.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Cutting Jackson would be boneheaded...You keep him one more year and you get 10million back in saving.. cut him this year you pay 12m and save 2m... there is no value in cutting Jackson. Trading? different story.

Plus if you cut Jackson then CB becomes a huge need. Remember the Tampa game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They saw something they liked with Austin Corbett.  I'm not sure if that's the answer, but we'll see. I was hoping they would grab a center, especially the kid out of WVA.  He seemed like a real dawg. So long as the Panthers are better than last year, I'll be satisfied.  I mean, we had the shortest time in the lead in the league and won two games.  Let's see that improvement!
    • I doubt he gets all the reps and snaps in preseason. But yeah, the kid better ball or things will get ugly quickly.
    • i don't see it as an overt neglect of the OL. They had several priorities they felt they had a bigger need to address and available options to take care of them. i would have liked to see us draft an OC, but not sure i'd want that rookie starting, esp. day 1. of course it depends on who it was. agree with it or not, their biggest priority has been on getting BY playmakers, and they got those.  those that have pointed out that FA period isn't over and cuts are likely coming are correct, the roster as is right now won't be what we see day 1. lots of time to pick one up...if they plan to. one thing to consider, they may actually like the idea of Corbett playing there. and, as hard as it might be to consider, that might actually be the right call. and having BC as the backup might just be enough. i don't know. i'm just going to sit back and watch it all unfold and be excited that we have those big OGs on either side of whoever we have starting at OC and we'll be a lot better for it. another thing to consider, BY might just be comfortable with Corbett already there. it's important that the QB feel confident in and have a bit of a connection with the OC.  either way, despite my being all in on Corbett as center, wishing that we had drafted someone, and hoping that we get someone in FA...i'm not upset or bothered by it. the team is in a lot better shape overall than last year going into the season and i feel good about the moves they have made so far. looking forward to what they do the rest of this offseason and what they do going into next year.
×
×
  • Create New...