Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers land Evero as DC


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mccjeff said:

Love this quote from it…

“You’ve got to affect the quarterback,” Evero said. “If you can’t get there with four, you’ve got to bring five, and if you can’t get there with five you’ve got to bring six. That’s my philosophy (on pressure).”

No more getting carved up by the Trubisky's of the world. Those guys are supposed to be folding under pressure, not dinking and dunking on a prevent defense in the 1st quarter

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Ugh, was just looking at that new rule, he might be TOO good of a hire for us to take advantage of it lol.

The coach needs to be a DC/OC for you for 2 years before getting a HC job for you to get the draft picks, so if he gets an HC job next year, we get nothing unfortunately.

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

No way you can prevent a coach from being able to interview for a "better" position, and even if you could you would never even bring it up when you are trying to land the best DC available in Evero.

This is a GREAT get for the Panthers!

Hope springs eternal!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

One of the big positives that led Evero to taking this job was apparently the ability to build his own staff on the defensive side of the ball. I wouldn't be surprised to see some folks from Denver join him. Also given Capers was a senior defensive assistant on Denver's staff last season and his ties to the franchise, wouldn't be surprised to see him come back here in that same role.

We have alot of exciting young talent on this team, defensively.  I would assume he is going to have alot of fun utilizing them.  

If we somehow get the QB position straight we might actually be a team to talk about next season.  Pull a 2021 Cincinnati.  Worst to First. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

No more getting carved up by the Trubisky's of the world. Those guys are supposed to be folding under pressure, not dinking and dunking on a prevent defense in the 1st quarter

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Or offensive schemes, or...well, anything 😕

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Per Albert Breer, when the time came to take a poll among the search committee on who was the preferred head coach candidate, Tepper abstained; specifically because he didn't want to influence anybody else's vote.

So no, It's not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

I didn’t watch it. I’m just stating facts.

The Rams offense put 44 points, 388 yard of offense, 14 passing 1st downs. Over 9 total drives.

They also had drives that included going ,60,75 and 90 yards for TD’s

Plus 60 and 68 yard drives for FG’s.

Thats still 27 points where they earned all of it.  

1 of those 4 picks you mentioned was returned for a TD, so did nothing for field position to help the rams, another was a touchback.

The other 17 of the 44 points that offense put up on them were still earned and saw next to 0 resistance by the broncos Defense.

 

Edited by panther4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...