Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Special Juan clickbait thread (aka nothing to see here)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Be that as it may, he’s still the best QB we’ve had since Cam’s shoulder died. 
 

edit: to clarify, I’d be fine with bringing him back cheap to be a bridge/backup to whomever we draft in the first this year, not as a long term plan. 

Which isn’t saying much at all. He still is a terrible QB. 
You don’t want him to be your starter because he will cause you to lose games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

We want to make the playoffs not be limited because our QB is a liability. 
Which Darnold will always be. He has, maybe 3 to 4 “ good” games in him and then he falls off a cliff. 
He isn’t a QB you want starting all season. . 

That’s why I said play him until the new kid is ready. I don’t think he should be the answer for the whole season. But I’d rather start with him and have a rookie waiting than trade for Carr. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

That’s why I said play him until the new kid is ready. I don’t think he should be the answer for the whole season. But I’d rather start with him and have a rookie waiting than trade for Carr. 

I’d rather have Brissett if we have to go the bridge route. 
I have see enough of Darnold to know we can’t trust him long enough to have the team in the right spot for the rookie to take over. 
Likely what will happen is we force the rookie into action too early because Darnold’s expiration date arrived. 

Darnold, like every backup, HAS an expiration date. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

We want to make the playoffs not be limited because our QB is a liability. 

The only shot we have at playoffs is because we play in the worst division in the NFL. I think we need to sign a bridge qb, pick AR at #9 (or Stroud but he won't fall that much), and then fill holes with the other picks. We need to quit trading picks for some player we think is going to get us over the top. We aren't anywhere near the top.  By the time Corral or AR is ready to play, we will have a solid team built around them and then we can shoot for the stars. Could be as early as '24 but it's not happening in '23. Our ceiling in '23 is a first round drubbing.  

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If we don't end up with one of those top 4 QB's im going to be disappointed because that likely means we are going the vet QB route again which means another 1st round draft pick in the 10-15 range next year.

 

We just delaying our franchise QB chase every year. It has to stop with this draft. Go get our QB!


It ultimately isn’t up to us though. Teams have to want to trade with us and/or teams ahead of us have to not take all the QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Any chance we can get Winston for super cheap? I'd take a chance on him as a bridge QB until whoever we (hopefully) draft is ready.

Bro...NO

Would 10 out of 10 rather have Darnold with Reich than Jameis "20/200" Winston. Jesus man. 

I also want to see what Corral can do.

We have a pickle here fellas. Defensive scheme change, $20 million in Cap space, five draft picks, new staff. 

We need to trade down in the first to get more picks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...