Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl LVII


Kentucky Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

That photo is the definition of defensive holding. The refs were asked to crack down on it this year…. And boy did they choose the moment to crack down….

As well the should. But, to even things out they need to crackdown on WR "push-offs" and all of the pick plays we see on the rub route. I enjoyed tonight's game. But playing defense in football is harder than playing defense in any other sport. And every year it seems to get harder.

Maybe they should eliminate tackling next so the offenses can score every time they get the ball.🤔

It would be great for everyone's fantasy team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Grass should have gone down the day after Arizona's last home game. That would have given it a chance at least to become a legit playing surface 

I'm sure they decided to employ tons of "consultants" and other morons who weren't qualified. It's like when someone opens a bar or something and it takes 3 months longer than expected to open then it's a week long poo show before opening day. It's funny BOA literally put grass down for that one Chelsea or whoever soccer game for one game and it looked perfect. Tepper can afford and knows how to put down grass

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Grass should have gone down the day after Arizona's last home game. That would have given it a chance at least to become a legit playing surface 

I think the last football game at that stadium was December 31, the Fiesta Bowl.  The NFL's grounds crew should have celebrated New Years Eve in Phoenix and been resodding on January 1.

Although it may have also been their new hybrid grass that was slick, who knows.  Why they would wait until two weeks before the game to do that is anybody's guess.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'm sure they decided to employ tons of "consultants" and other morons who weren't qualified. It's like when someone opens a bar or something and it takes 3 months longer than expected to open then it's a week long poo show before opening day. It's funny BOA literally put grass down for that one Chelsea or whoever soccer game for one game and it looked perfect. Tepper can afford and knows how to put down grass

It's not like anyone would notice someone slipping in a soccer game anyway with all the flopping going on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I think the last football game at that stadium was December 31, the Fiesta Bowl.  The NFL's grounds crew should have celebrated New Years Eve in Phoenix and been resodding on January 1.

Although it may have also been their new hybrid grass that was slick, who knows.  Why they would wait until two weeks before the game to do that is anybody's guess.   

I mean it is a golf turf. Idk what the point of using it in a football stadium was. Though I do think the paint job was also a large problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

I really wonder if the pendulum will ever swing back towards the defense. Even Tepper said part of why he wanted a OC was because a new offensive rule is being passed every year.

IMO, get rid of offensive holding and defensive holding and let them go at it. Got to keep DPI and RTP but those are a little less subjective to human error I guess. 

As long as the perception is that offense= eyeballs and defense=boring, the pendulum won't swing back. It's just a question of how long before it's basically Arena rules out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about the huge call at the end there. If this has been discussed in the past 10 pages, my bad. But to the "you can't call that" and "just let them play" crowd:

So ... do you not call ANYTHING then? You just let them play? That's insane. So then, they only call blatant calls? If that's your stance ... do you mean to tell me you want players to be able to do small holds, tugs, grabs, etc. in the last two minutes? That's insane.

Do you want guys to just play and refs call blatant stuff, or want refs to be a judge and let small stuff go but call medium sized stuff lol? Jesus. Where do you draw the line?

The obvious answer is ... refs should make the same calls all game long. Whomever came up with the "just let them play" BS is a fool. JB admitted he tugged on the receiver. End of story. It got called. If you were a diehard Chiefs fan you'd be livid had it not been called.

So yes ... to you gentlemen who want the refs to keep their flags in their pockets ... where's the line? What should they throw a flag on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not like anyone would notice someone slipping in a soccer game anyway with all the flopping going on.

Soccer doesn't have nearly the same amount of abrupt cutting and starts/stops as football. Some, sure, but more forgiving of poorer surfaces IME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I live in KC, have for many years. No, many, if not most, of them aren't.

You just have to let frank slide on here. He's not white. It's similar to how he laughs at many guys on here who have interesting opinions on POC. Let him think what he wants. No harm, no foul. It's just font on your screen at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...