Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr’s destination betting odds


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

They had to move on from Carr or McDaniel. They couldn't afford(literally) to fire McDaniel so Carr it is. 

Yep, Raiders owner, Mark Davis, is a poor man trying to win at a rich man's game.  He is a dunderhead in comparison to his father.  Of all the dumb moves Mark has made over the years, hiring McDaniels is the dumbest.  Now he can't afford to fire guy, so Carr had to go.  McDaniels will destroy the Raiders just like he destroyed the Broncos.

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Because they have two guys on rookie contracts. One just played pretty well and the other they traded a ton to move up to draft. If I was them I'd have the same plan they likely have - go into camp and let them battle it out.

That team is a QB1 from a Super Bowl.  The young guys are fine but it seems like a hell of an opportunity to waste on Lance and Purdy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Please let him go to the Saints!

 

Nobody is fearing Carr in this division.

 

That's also helps us in the draft the Saints were ahead of us looking for a QB.

Be careful what you wish for.  The Saints have a good OL, solid defense, and some playmakers in Kamara and Olave.  Give them a good QB plus the draft pick they got back for Payton they could be dangerous in the NFC...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

That team is a QB1 from a Super Bowl.  The young guys are fine but it seems like a hell of an opportunity to waste on Lance and Purdy.

If Purdy or Lance were healthy they could have won the Super Bowl.  They were down to their 3rd string in the NFC championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just say I wouldn't hate it if we picked Carr up. I'm a fan and it would help us focus the draft on getting an upgrade at WR, TE, and/or CB.

He'd be more expensive than a rookie, but we'd come out of the gates a lot quicker, we'd have a really good QB with a huge chip in his shoulder, and we wouldn't have to give up any draft capital to get him.

Basically I'm good if we draft one of the top 3 or if we pick Carr up.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a QB looking to rebuild his resume......panthers looking sooo hawt right now...

Im not a Carr fan, but like him more than many huddlers. 

Carr has had 20 HCs during his raiders era, think about it.....I bet more OCs too...

Raiders have ranked 32 in defense since Carr was drafted.

Then theres the one playoff game and inconstancy, but I blame the raiders org much more than Carr.

Hes in the Cousins group for me.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

He'd be more expensive than a rookie, but we'd come out of the gates a lot quicker, we'd have a really good QB with a huge chip in his shoulder, and we wouldn't have to give up any draft capital to get him.

This is almost assuredly the discussion Reich's coaches and Tepper are having at the moment.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...