Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

What do you want Panthers to do this offseason?  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you want Panthers to do regarding QB situation this offseason

    • Draft best available QB at current draft position (#9)
      59
    • Trade up with Bears (#1) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
      47
    • Trade up with Cardinals (#3) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
      58
    • Sign Derek Carr and draft best available player at #9
      51
    • Trade for Lamar Jackson, fully guaranteed contract (Watson like trade)
      2

Recommended Posts

NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted (edited)

I would like to gauge where we stand as a fanbase on this topic.  A lot of people seem to be warming up to idea of signing another free agent instead of drafting a potential franchise QB. What say you? 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kentucky Panther Mentor

Kentucky Panther

Posted
Posted (edited)

My choices in order:

 

Trade up to 3, grab the QB they like the best out of who’s available. 
 

Trade up to 1, go ahead and give up the farm and get exactly who they want. 
 

Sign Carr, draft BPA at 9. 
 

I don’t want us to sit at 9 and take the leftovers from the QB spot. Last option for me. 

Edited by Kentucky Panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted (edited)
  • Sign Darnold to two year, 5 mil per year deal if he'll accept.
  • Wait until draft night for any trade up since a team like the Colts could jump us if we move to 3 too early.
  • If the right guy (Young or Stroud) is there at pick #3, make the call.
  • If Young & Stroud are both gone by pick #3, trade down and select BPA.
  • Draft Hooker with our 3rd or 4A pick.
  • Play Darnold the first 5 games. If we're 3-2 or better, keep rolling until we're out of playoff contention. If we're 2-3 or worse, insert Hooker/Corral to see what they have. If they don't have it, it doesn't matter and stick with them putting us in good position to grab a QB in the 2024 draft.

 

Edited by ECHornet
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monty83 Contributor

Monty83

Posted
Posted

I hate Matt Rhule and his selection so much right now. Because we feel the need to rush this process now. We have zero patience. We have the staff we should’ve had before. Either go all-in and trade up for YOUR guy or trade out of 9 and do the same thing next year with two first rounders. DO NOT get a guy just because he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Greg beats Brady for Sportscasting Emmy

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I liked him when he was at Michigan because I'm a Wolverine homer. After that... 
    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
×
×
  • Create New...