Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers met with Hooker per report


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

and higher than Josh Allen's were in college?  So what exactly does that mean??  Is he a stronger Josh Allen because of your random metric you are using?  Seems pretty flawed....

You are the one that quoted a random metric to start this debate off.  You decided to only use a small portion of Bridgewater's college statistics to make him seem slow, unathletic, and unable to scramble.  His yards came after major knee reconstruction too.

When the reality is Hooker and Bridgewater both have mild scrambling ability, are known for accuracy, and are both injury prone.  Hooker should be happy if he winds up with the same career as Teddy toilet water.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

You are the one that quoted a random metric to start this debate off.  You decided to only use a small portion of Bridgewater's college statistics to make him seem slow, unathletic, and unable to scramble.  His yards came after major knee reconstruction too.

When the reality is Hooker and Bridgewater both have mild scrambling ability, are known for accuracy, and are both injury prone.  Hooker should be happy if he winds up with the same career as Teddy toilet water.

A QB with over 2000 rushing yards and 25 rushing TDs in college isn't what I would consider "mild scrambling."  Teddy had like 1/10th of that against lesser defenses and you want to sit here and act like they are similar in that sense?  Sometimes its ok to just say "yeah it was a bad comparison." I like in Knoxville and watched most UT games.  They drew up QB runs, mixed in some RPOs, and if Hooker had space he was going to take it.  Again I'm not that high on him as a NFL prospect, but he definitely in a different level athletically than Teddy was in college.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People, the "plan" is not to do one thing--it is to examine your options.  If you are closing your mind to a possibility while criticizing others for not sharing you're elite football acumen, then you are kinda coming off like a spoiled child.  Just say you don't know and your skeptical--that is fine--but to act like people who think Hooker is a sure-fire bust and anyone who thinks differently is an idiot--I am not sure the effect you were hoping for is working to your advantage.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

A QB with over 2000 rushing yards and 25 rushing TDs in college isn't what I would consider "mild scrambling."  Teddy had like 1/10th of that against lesser defenses and you want to sit here and act like they are similar in that sense?  Sometimes its ok to just say "yeah it was a bad comparison." I like in Knoxville and watched most UT games.  They drew up QB runs, mixed in some RPOs, and if Hooker had space he was going to take it.  Again I'm not that high on him as a NFL prospect, but he definitely in a different level athletically than Teddy was in college.

It's debatable.  Hooker is an okay scrambler.  But the comparison remains valid.  Hooker isn't significantly more athletic then Bridgewater.  I'm not sure he bounces back completely after that ACL tear either.

Both of them are similar in the pocket. I'd rather have Hookers backup at UT honestly.

Bridgewater didn't scramble at all in the two years following his knee rebuild.  The years after that when he was the starter both here and Miami his ypc were on par with Hookers and that's in the NFL. That's all I'm saying. It's a legit comparison. Hooker is a backup at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheMaulClaw said:

It's debatable.  Hooker is an okay scrambler.  But the comparison remains valid.  Hooker isn't significantly more athletic then Bridgewater.  I'm not sure he bounces back completely after that ACL tear either.

Both of them are similar in the pocket. I'd rather have Hookers backup at UT honestly.

Bridgewater didn't scramble at all in the two years following his knee rebuild.  The years after that when he was the starter both here and Miami his ypc were on par with Hookers and that's in the NFL. That's all I'm saying. It's a legit comparison. Hooker is a backup at best.

Hooker’s backup? Joe Milton? He has a cannon and is huge, but damn he overthrew a lot of passes in his limited playing time. If he can work on his accuracy he might be NFL material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Hooker’s backup? Joe Milton? He has a cannon and is huge, but damn he overthrew a lot of passes in his limited playing time. If he can work on his accuracy he might be NFL material.

Yeah that's why I said it.  He's a prospect that intrigues way more then Hooker.

I'm a Gamecocks fan dude, I keep up with every team in the SEC.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2023 at 2:08 PM, TheCasillas said:

They were in night and day different systems with completely opposite side of the spectrum talent. Levis was dealt a short hand last year and played through 3 different injuries simutlaneously. 
 

The stats dont tell the story. Can't get wrapped up in that without understanding the systems and situations.

Doesn't matter... Levis is the suck

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Yeah that's why I said it.  He's a prospect that intrigues way more then Hooker.

I'm a Gamecocks fan dude, I keep up with every team in the SEC.

My dad was a gamecocks fan. He was from Camden, SC. I always find myself low key pulling for them except when they play Auburn.

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has the most interesting pre-draft to me.

The reason I say predraft is because let's say the Saints miss out on Carr, miss out on Rodgers, Miss out on Lamar. Then I can see where people start slotting him at 29 sooner rather than later. Or say the Giants only tag DJ, no long term deal, you can see that being 25. You could then make a case for 23 to Minn, or 19 to TB, 16 to Washington. You can see where I'm going with this.

This is all hypothetical, but I can see him having a Ponder-esqe rise if he kills it pre-draft. Dude's tape shows the ability to make any throw and he has the ability to thrive in chaos. Age doesn't matter if dude can ball at the most important position. Don't get me wrong, he infuraties me how often he'll break a pocket because he doesn't trust a window schemed open is right, but honest I think he's more polished as a passer than Fields coming out, and I think he's miles better as a passer than Richardson or McKee. 

He's what people thought Corral was last year pre-draft, imo. Age is the only thing holding him back and I really don't think that'll matter with the hyperfocus on rookie contracts, he'll be 29 when it's time to consider his 5th year option. 

E: I also want to add, I'd hate the pick at 9, but this draft is weird and I've seen weirder poo. I'd think even if best case pre-draft happens for Hooker, we could trade just out of the top 10 and get some value before reaching. But I do see a way where he doesn't make it out the first, I really don't know if there's 25-30 players better than Hooker this draft.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Java Burn Reviews 2024 [Canada & USA] Scam Alert , Java Burn Coffee Weight Loss Shocking Results! https://jobs.police1.com/job/jdpb5y/java-burn-reviews-(updated-real-critical-customer-warning-)-exposed-pros-cons-ingredients-pricing/java-burn-reviews/california https://jobs.police1.com/job/797qcw/real-java-burn-reviews-((new-hidden-13th-may-2024-alert-))-java-burn-ingredients-exposed-fhtg-49/voice/id
    • The probem.is that Bryce  didn't come from a system that threw on timing and used mostly West Coast concepts. He held the ball and bought time trying for a big play which he often made given lesser college talent. He tried to do the same thing last year and it failed miserably.  Of course he can throw timing routes and hit spots as he is very accurate. But you can't judge him a failure if he played in a new system with a poor coaching staff and had to do things he rarely practiced in college.
    • Java Burn presents an unique approach to burn belly fat by drinking coffee. Yes, that’s right you heard it right now your morning coffee can help you to lose belly fat. By all means, this is a weight loss solution that fixes your metabolism and induces fat burning enzymes. Click Here to visit Official Java Burn Website! So, now you can easily burn extra body fat by just using our product in your morning coffee. However, it consists of several natural ingredients that are helpful in treating metabolic syndrome and satiating your hunger cravings in the best way possible. So, you shouldn’t be worried about taking extreme dietary measures to sustain a calorie deficit state for weight loss. Let’s explore more in this review to get a closer glimpse about the product. Introducing Java Burn coffee as a belly fat burner Java Burn exceptionally carries out weight loss by strengthening your morning ritual of coffee. As a result, you will feel energetic and alert throughout the day. However, there’s also something much more interesting relying on the product’s usage highlighting the metabolic state. As we all know, the body’s metabolism plays a crucial role in fat storage and energy production. But as we become obese or overweight our metabolism slows down resulting in a syndrome-like condition storing much higher fat at different sections of the body. It naturally fixes metabolic state and initiates the fat burning process resulting in weight loss. Why does Java Burn work best with the morning coffee? The morning coffee is your daily ritual that can’t be skipped at any cost. Therefore, it becomes a habit and we all know Java Burn demands regular consumption of the formula resulting in fat loss. So, what better option for taking this formula than your morning coffee? The answer relies on the question itself  as it should be taken with coffee to increase metabolic stress and alertness in the best way possible. Fortunately, the natural ingredients play a critical role in delivering essential enzymes designed for fat loss naturally. KNOW MORE about Java Burn Coffee! Click here What’s inside the Java Burn package? Java Burn brings a much awaited proprietary blend for weight loss process. However, in this blend all the essential ingredients are completely organic and free from harmful compounds giving you a sense of belief within the formula. Therefore, each ingredient has a special role in terms of promoting weight loss, energy and metabolic boost. List is given below:- Chlorogenic Acid is a natural insulin support enzyme serving the calories deficit. Camellia Sinensis works best with fat burning substitutes in morning coffee. Chromium is a fat inhibiting ingredient defining several aspects of deliverance in fat loss. L Carnitine is the best fat burner solution as it helps to burn belly fat naturally. L-Theanine helps to restore appetite by reducing hunger cravings and stress on surviving maintenance calories.
×
×
  • Create New...