Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt indicates the Panthers should bring in Carr


TheMaulClaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

Keeping in mind that the football world is in the peak of the 'LYING SEASON', that will continue thru free agency & the draft. Talking heads will post anything as "facts" for clicks & reads. Please consider all of these "facts" with a grain of salt. Carolina FO & coaches should talk to Carr & any other player that could improve the team. If Carr fits into what they want to achieve, offer him a reasonable deal, if he declines, move on to the next. Reasonable offer: three years in the 80-100M range, starter position to be determined by his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

 

 

Before I would pay Brissett 15 mil I would pay 30 for Carr. Difference of 15 mil for some decent vs a place holder. 3 years max while developing a quarterback. I hope whatever happens we draft a quarterback with our first pick.

30 mil is about my ideal price for Carr and about 10 mil my ideal price for Brissett. Now, would definitely prefer less but I would personally get a little concerned if we saw prices over that for either of them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ornias said:

Would Brissett be an option? 2 year bridge contract for like 10-15m a year. 

I'd much prefer Brissett over Carr due to price and I don't believe the talent gap is a large as some people would point out. Like the difference between the 10-12 best QB in the league vs. the 15-17th

 

no matter what though we HAVE to get a rookie QB. we have kicked this can down the road for FAR too long 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As much as we talk about Carr we sure are taking our sweet time meeting with him.

 

Is a meeting coming or is this just talk for a guy we aren't even interested in?

 

He's been a FA for 2 weeks now.

Seems like the Rodgers decision is the first domino needing to fall.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

People better get used to Brissett.

 

Carr wants a bag and we don't have the money to go after him. We don't seem interested in Rodgers/Lamar either.

 

Brissett/Rookie QB always seemed like the most realistic option.

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

We could go after mike white for 4 yrs cheaper than what Carr wants for 1 yr.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Geno to Seattle not set in stone?

If you're Smith, do you risk leaving the OC and coaching staff that helped bring you back into the limelight?

If I were to guess, I'd say it probably depends at least somewhat on whether you think they're going to stick with you 🤔

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...