Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In-Depth Film Evaluation on QB Anthony Richardson


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 2/28/2023 at 7:26 AM, CPcavedweller said:

I watched a lot of Billy Napier offense the past five years. There is nothing "unfriendly" about that offense. Sorry, if Levi Lewis can throw for almost 3,000 yards and run for a few hundred at 5'10 at Louisiana while Richardson completes 52% of his passes, that's a Richardson issue.

That offense is all bootlegs, play action, and spacing. It's not hard. It's not unfriendly.

Weird all of the excuses for Richardson. Florida has an "unfriendly" qb offense, their team has no talent, it's the wr fault, etc. etc. They recruited plenty of talent and AR went out and threw for 33% against FSU and then quit before the bowl. I'm going out on a limb and saying the most successful qb from this class will not be Young, Stroud, Levis or Richardson. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I've not seen him "light up" about any of these guys. I think fans of a certain prospect see what they want to see.

It was a radio interview so I didn’t actually see him do anything. Did you hear/see his comments?  

I haven’t even watched Richardson play one time. Don’t think I would be included in his fan club. But, the approach of taking a guy this year and signing the best vet QB we can sign, I like.  I don’t even shy from Carr and a qb at #9, or later. You cannot really go wrong having two starting level QBs if the draft pick worked out. I guess you could trade the wrong one. Anyhow, make the Carr deal so you can bail after three at the most, and proceed with stocking the QB room. 
 

I don’t generally indulge in fantasy but I imagine how cool having some brain trust that was all about developing QBs and being selected by or spending time in Carolina became like, an endorsement of a player. Step right up, bring your draft picks. We’ll make more. 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rebelrouser said:

Weird all of the excuses for Richardson. Florida has an "unfriendly" qb offense, their team has no talent, it's the wr fault, etc. etc. They recruited plenty of talent and AR went out and threw for 33% against FSU and then quit before the bowl. I'm going out on a limb and saying the most successful qb from this class will not be Young, Stroud, Levis or Richardson. 

We did not have great talent on offense this year. Full stop. This was a bad offense outside of running and one offensive lineman. This might be the worst group of pass catchers in all the SEC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We all do it.

 

You're just not a fan of AR. Which is why you agree with certain rumored tweets and get defensive on the rumored tweets you dont like...

I have no preference for any of them. I do hope they do not trade multiple picks for any of them. As far as AR goes I base my opinions on the rankings of the pro scouts. From what I've seen he's not among the top 5 qb's in this draft. If we draft him i hope he proves everyone wrong, including me.  I feel the same way about any of these prospects.  None are a sure thing and all need lots of development.  Some more than others. AR is in the more category that will need a lot of development before you will ever see if there's any promise there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I have no preference for any of them. I do hope they do not trade multiple picks for any of them. As far as AR goes I base my opinions on the rankings of the pro scouts. From what I've seen he's not among the top 5 qb's in this draft. If we draft him i hope he proves everyone wrong, including me.  I feel the same way about any of these prospects.  None are a sure thing and all need lots of development.  Some more than others. AR is in the more category that will need a lot of development before you will ever see if there's any promise there.

May I ask which pro scouts you follow don’t have him in the top 5 QBs of this draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure if Duggan is an NFL QB at all. I'll be shocked if he's ever anything more than a backup.

What I haven't see I a lot of talk of McKee. I'm surprised with how he is ranked among the class there's not been one mention of him. Duggan was interviewed by us I think. That surprised me as he's not in the top 5 ranks either.  It's hard to get a guage on anyone outside the top 4 media darlings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure if Duggan is an NFL QB at all. I'll be shocked if he's ever anything more than a backup.

Yeah this draft has a pretty substantial drop-off from what I see after the top 5. 

T1: Young, Stroud

T2: Richardson, Levis 

T3: Hooker

Cliff

You've got McKee, Haener (fan), Tune, Hall & Duggan the remainder of the draft.  I'd say 3rd absolute highest to 7th rounders.    

I'm unsure if any of the rest are even drafteable.  Solid top, but not a large QB class.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

What I haven't see I a lot of talk of McKee. I'm surprised with how he is ranked among the class there's not been one mention of him. Duggan was interviewed by us I think. That surprised me as he's not in the top 5 ranks either.  It's hard to get a guage on anyone outside the top 4 media darlings. 

McKee's throwing motion and footwork are wonky.  For being so prototypical size wise, he doesn't really have the feel IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Weird all of the excuses for Richardson. Florida has an "unfriendly" qb offense, their team has no talent, it's the wr fault, etc. etc. They recruited plenty of talent and AR went out and threw for 33% against FSU and then quit before the bowl. I'm going out on a limb and saying the most successful qb from this class will not be Young, Stroud, Levis or Richardson. 

Excuses for AR ... hmm ... what does that remind me of lol. Classic Huddle back on their BS already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

What I haven't see I a lot of talk of McKee. I'm surprised with how he is ranked among the class there's not been one mention of him. Duggan was interviewed by us I think. That surprised me as he's not in the top 5 ranks either.  It's hard to get a guage on anyone outside the top 4 media darlings. 

What am I missing on Clayton Tune?  He seems to be getting overlooked while lighting it up a Houston.  He looks to have decent size as well as a ton of experience....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

McKee's throwing motion and footwork are wonky.  For being so prototypical size wise, he doesn't really have the feel IMO.  

I thought the scouts were like his mechanics and release?  He is a tough one to grade because he was constantly running for his life at Stanford.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

It's going to be interesting watching the reaction of fans if we trade up for Richardson, i.e. not one of the two QBs they've fallen in love with. 

Is it going to be all talk about "trusting the staff" and "shooting your shot" for a QB if we don't take the guy(s) they want?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ravens mixing it up with a random Mark Andrew tush push last year isn't a similar situation.  Lamar has run QB sneaks his entire career.  And often instead of a traditional sneak will even employ a 4th and 1 direct snap to Lamar simply because of how athletic he is (which even Cam did a lot of) and let him pick his own holes.  
    • height being an issue doesn't just mean batted balls.  You could argue Bryce minimizes batted balls by adopting other poor habits such as his jump passing and leaving the pocket.   As I said, there are plays you can point to where he clearly was blind to parts of the field/players....which kills plays and opportunity. Which actually means some of the shorter/hot throws when things break down are where his vision gets blocked (and he had below average production all around the line of scrimmage).   has he figured it out? I mean, he improved off a trainwreck start.  But Bryce Young since arriving in the league (even while figuring it out)......doesn't generate much offensive production vs his peers.  I just think his ceiling is low.   And that's not in the grand scheme what you want in the NFL.  I think he can develop into a serviceable QB, that will largely always been a middle of the pack or low end starter.   
    • People make a lot of noise about his footwork and I think it is overblown. Whether he takes 3 steps backwards or 5 small steps doesn't matter as long as he ends up at the right depth and is in sync with  the receiver regarding timing. If he does that consistently who cares as long as he has a firm stable base as he delivers the ball. Which he does need to work on. However even that is somewhat overblown given that often QBs have to throw off balance or from different arm angles to fit the ball around defenders. He is considered very accurate so apparently it isn't hurting him that much.
×
×
  • Create New...