Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

National media bias is real


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Will they go to commercial during our pick is the real questioned that needs to be answered. 

hahaha now that would be some next level trolling if they did even when we pick #1 overall

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I'm anxiously awaiting what we do at WR. Because right now we might have the worst WR corps in the NFL on paper. That's not exactly setting up your highly drafted rookie QB for success.

They will make some moves but I wouldn't expect us to have a true #1 until next year when we have more cap room 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NAS said:

Cam Newton would have been beloved if he played for Cowboys

Steve Smith would have been considered a top 5 WR of all time and a HOF if he played for the 49ers or Chiefs

Luke Kuechly would be considered one of the best middle LBs of all time if he had played for Steelers or the Ravens

DJ Moore was never even talked about until this trade, suddenly the Bears got themselves a top 5 WR.  LOL

There are exceptions to this, but of course, the pundits are mostly lazy and only research their talking points for the big market teams.  The lack of intelligent analysis and insights are shocking.  

Panthers didn't get fleeced in the trade, if anything they came out slightly ahead in terms of value analysis.  But all that anyone talks about is how smart their GM is, the same GM who traded a 2nd rounder for Chase Claypool, LMAO.

 

 

 

 

 

The only thing I disagree with in this post is the notion that a lack of intelligent insight and analysis by national pundits is shocking.

If you've been paying attention over time, and NAS I'm pretty sure you have, it's not shocking.

It's expected.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

They will make some moves but I wouldn't expect us to have a true #1 until next year when we have more cap room 

I don't really care about a "true #1". Seems like according to most Panthers fans there's always only a handful of true number ones in the league and everyone else is just a "good #2". A "true #1" is a borderline mythical creature according to Pantherdom.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Most people only know this team through fantasy football and DJ being our only above average WR got fed well

Last year people hated him he was giving them an average of 8 pts per game.  Terrible production for a WR1.  He was a FLEX option at best.

image.thumb.png.9170e732dcc5a2469791edb5c55e2666.png

 

 

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't really care about a "true #1". Seems like according to most Panthers fans there's always only a handful of true number ones in the league and everyone else is just a "good #2". A "true #1" is a borderline mythical creature according to Pantherdom.

I really wants us to go after Higgins.  I'd trade for him this year if it were possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

The only thing I disagree with in this post is the notion that a lack of intelligent insight and analysis by national pundits is shocking.

If you've been paying attention over time, and NAS I'm pretty sure you have, it's not shocking.

It's expected.

You're right, and normally I wouldn't care if it wasn't always quoted on this board by naive and gullible fans as some sort of gospel.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Well, the expectation is to always try to improve and strengthen your position(s).  But realistic expectations and context should always be a part of that calculation in my opinion. We don't have another first this year or next, so I think that the wise man takes that into account. Long term, I'd like us to replace DJ with a better player, but short term we may not be able to do that---may not be able to do that. What we should be able to do in my estimation is to improve the room, notwithstanding the loss of DJ. There are receivers in FA that can help us to that end (even another DJ). We will also have choices day two in the draft. 

I'm not "happy" about losing Moore, but I certainly don't think it's the end of the world by any stretch of the imagination. New QB, new receivers, new offensive- minded HC: that's not a reason to be generally upset in my opinion.

Moore can be replaced the issue isn't just that it's also getting an even better player we just raised our own bar by discarding him. Now the stakes are even higher for Fitt. That's on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NAS said:

Steve and Luke get the minimal credits, they can't be ignored completely, but you're delusional if you don't think they would have been put on much higher pedestal if they played in bigger markets

I remember having a conversation about football after church and brought up Steve Smith. Not one person even knew who he was. This was in 2007 or 2008 when he was arguably the best WR in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eric4280 said:

I’m honestly shocked that people know who DJ moore is. This is so damn true, as soon as he’s traded “omg bears have their all time best wr ever and he’s only 25!!’xbcnxnx” 

Exactly DJ suddenly got a lot better after we traded him.  It’s interesting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...