Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Have the Panthers played this well?


Jaxel
 Share

Recommended Posts

Reports that we are looking to trade down, some say we stay, some say we want Stroud, others Young. Now even reports about Richardson. Honestly, no one has any idea what they are going to do. The last few years it feels like the Panthers plans were an open book, easy to read. But are the Panthers pulling off a legitimate smokescreen here? Or have the made a rash move an now outsmarted themselves? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think the trade down thing is a smokescreen, but word is it's unlikely they'd go any further down than second overall.

I guess the wild card would be if the Cardinals made some insane offer, but slid still call it unlikely.

If we can work out a deal to move down with the Cardinals and take Hopkins off their hands for them while also landing Stroud/Young I'd call this a home run.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Can multiple trades happen per selection or is it just one per pick ?

It would be a total Panthers scenario where we trade to #2 with Houston, then some other team swoops in and trades with Houston to take our guy.

Picks can be traded as often as teams want 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're fine.  Just stay put and grab our QB.

The most important thing now --we'll just have to be careful with how we maneuver the 39th and 93rd picks.  

TE wise--Kincaid & Mayer will likely be off the board, WR wise, Flowers, S-N, Addison & Johnston

WR: Hyatt, Downs, Scott TE: LaPorta, Musgrave, Washington are the names we should be looking at in my opinion.

It could be in our benefit to trade down if a team is targeting one of the many top EDGE talent that will be available.  Move down a tad, gain another mid-rounder.  Almost HAVE to take a receiving talent, but I tell you, if a guy like Ojulari is available, would he be too good to pass on?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaxel said:

I think the only threat to trade up is the Colts. Is this just trying to get the texans to move? I read somewhere that Caserio is not looking to trade up though, so there doesn't seem to be much incentive.

If the Texans thought the Colts were trading up for the guy they wanted, it's possible.

Mind you, I don't really think it happens, but I also don't think it's just talk. They're serious.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

I think we're fine.  Just stay put and grab our QB.

The most important thing now --we'll just have to be careful with how we maneuver the 39th and 93rd picks.  

TE wise--Kincaid & Mayer will likely be off the board, WR wise, Flowers, S-N, Addison & Johnston

WR: Hyatt, Downs, Scott TE: LaPorta, Musgrave, Washington are the names we should be looking at in my opinion.

It could be in our benefit to trade down if a team is targeting one of the many top EDGE talent that will be available.  Move down a tad, gain another mid-rounder.  Almost HAVE to take a receiving talent, but I tell you, if a guy like Ojulari is available, would he be too good to pass on?

 

 

If we land Downs in the second to pair with stroud that we won the draft with 2 picks.  Everything else is gravy. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right and I think we can have a conversation about that. But even with the scheme he should still be able to muster more than 1.5 sacks right? I mean DJ Johnson played in Evero's scheme too but that didn't stop us from calling him a bust. Scourton didn't seem to have trouble flashing. There can be different things true at one time.
    • I assume you are quoting my still. If so, I don't know what your argument is since mine was simply showing a play where Bryce scored a TD against the Rams in the playoffs where another poster used a similar still of Herbert's line to defend his poor performance last night. Like I said, Herbert is a better QB but Bryce wins the game last night for the Chargers. It simply is something he does better than Herbert and would play to his strengths. Someone even said earlier Chargers only win 1 or 2 games this year if Bryce was their QB which is so absurdly laughable it wasn't even worth trying to address. I mean this thread is literally called "Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panther's History" so I understand there is no objective arguments to be had here but I found that amusing. 
    • I think his knee would make a good reason to switch to guard IF he returns.  Half don't.  Half of those don't last too long.  The strain on a knee (320lb man) vs speed rushers is more substantial.  So I would keep him if I could on a small contract (he will make $17.5 in 2026 fully guaranteed) and think of him as a possible guard for the post Lewis/Hunt era.  Knee injuries in big men are not invitations to invest in them.  
×
×
  • Create New...