Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andy Dalton is a Panther


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I don’t get anyone complaining about this. This is a role that’s needed for our next franchise qb to set him on the right track on how to be a professional. DA did it with Cam.

Yeah, I'm fine with it. Don't really get the anger

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

I think the other teams have improved or look better than us right now. Hopefully we hit some homers during the draft. But right now we look like a team picking in the top half of the first round again. 

lol this take from acquiring a fuging backup QB. Jesus Christ, some of you need to get a grip.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

$10M for 2 years was about what I was hoping for to get somebody who can credibly play the position when needed.  I was afraid that budget was going to get busted.  That was why the idea of Brissett didn't bother me.

The fact he is 35 and he knows his best years are in his rear view mirror is also ideal, assuming we do not do something stupid at #1.  While I am not certain we will not do something stupid at #1, I feel a lot better about our odds than I would have, say, a year or two ago.

Seems like a pretty good pickup to me, based on what (I hope) we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...