Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schefter: Bryce Young is believed to be favorite for #1 for the Panthers right now

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, travisura said:

We better be damn sure that who we want will still be there if we trade down.

Well if you like two guys, trading down to #2 Is a pretty safe bet you'll still get one that you want.

If you like three guys, you might still be able to pull it off by trading down to #4 given that Arizona doesn't want a quarterback. You'd have to have some kind of assurance that they weren't going to trade the pick to someone who does though.

(Adrian Wilson could come in handy there)

It's an extremely high stakes poker game.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivory Panther Proficient

Ivory Panther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, rayzor said:

i think the processing abilities and quickness are very high for both. i think that stroud may just be the better of the two at managing the game.

Based on what? lol. I feel like ppl just make "analysis" out of thin air. what is managing a game and how has Stroud done that better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We might not.

But that doesn't mean we aren't open to it if we get a good offer.

Then we would be absolute fools and a complete laughing stock.  We are not trading and they absolutely know without a shadow of a doubt who they are taking.  You don't trade that haul without knowing.  It just doesn't happen like that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivory Panther Proficient

Ivory Panther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stan786 said:

Pressures according to PFF (Sack numbers are a little different for some reason)

Young (They have 7 in 2020, 35 in 2021, 18 Sacks in 2022)

  • 2020 - 14 Pressures (50% Pressure to sack)
  • 2021 - 226 Pressures (15.5% Pressure to sack)
  • 2022 - 144 Pressures (12.5% Pressure to sack)

Stroud (They have 12 sacks in 2021 and 14 in 2022)

  • 2020 - 0 Pressures
  • 2021 - 111 Pressures (10.8% Pressure to sack)
  • 2022 - 99 Pressures (14.1% Pressure to sack)

 

Very interesting stat. 

2021 Bryce was pressured over 100% more than CJ with similar weapons and won the Heisman.

2022 Bryce was pressured 50% more than CJ with less weapons but posted similar numbers in stats & wins.

As I have stated before, both QBs are good but Bryce has proven that he can do more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PantherKyle said:

Why the hell are people so mean and snippy with eachother on here?

Guys, we all love the Panthers. We may disagree, but just have discourse and don't get personal, it's not that hard lmao. 

I will be elated with either of the two, and be a huge stan of them for a decade and defend against all the haters lol. 

Keep pounding. 

They're not real fans. They hate on players that haven't played yet as an extension of their hate on yours truly...

end yes GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Then we would be absolute fools and a complete laughing stock.  We are not trading and they absolutely know without a shadow of a doubt who they are taking.  You don't trade that haul without knowing.  It just doesn't happen like that.  

I think they know without a shadow of a doubt they like at least two guys. Which guy may be tbd, but they could absolutely trade that haul because they know they love at least one but maybe two guys and they want to be able to decide between them without hoping someone ahead of them takes their guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Levis was always a high pick. You left out Carson Strong…. 

Levis wasn't a consensus last season when I joined the bandwagon. I had him as a late first early second bargain.

But if the NFL and Payton Manning agree with me but even more, who am I to argue.

Carson's knee, unfortunately, you know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...