Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich/Fitterer noon press conference


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nickel IS the base package in the modern NFL. You're in nickel probably at least 75% of the time.

we are not a base of nickel. We are a 3-4 base. You dont put a nickel package on the field against a jumbo or 21 or 22 offensive package. Lions did that against us last year..... how did that turn out? 

Coach Campbell even said that he was stubborn and stayed in nickel bc he thought it would eventually work. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we are not a base of nickel. We are a 3-4 base. You dont put a nickel package on the field against a jumbo or 21 or 22 offensive package. Lions did that against us last year..... how did that turn out? 

Coach Campbell even said that he was stubborn and stayed in nickel bc he thought it would eventually work. 

Good grief man. Go argue with Scott Fitterer. The man stood right there at the podium and said you're in nickel 75-80% of snaps.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

I personally prefer Stroud because of his pinpoint accuracy and ability to drive the ball downfield.  I think he is slightly better than Young in both those areas.

Same. 

There’s also 2-3 plays every game where Stroud throws a dot while on the move. There’s this narrative going around that it only happened in the Georgia game and that’s far from the truth 

Young for me is just someone who always seems to come up big when needed the most. Their losses weren’t his fault. He’s a playmaker who keeps gets doubted. I feel like his career is going to play out similar. Also doubted due to his height but just continues to come up big when needed the most 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Good grief man. Go argue with Scott Fitterer. The man stood right there at the podium and said you're in nickel 75-80% of snaps.

you think base means how often you are in a certain package. Thats not what it is ... its based on how you assemble the roster. 3-4 completely changes for your talent acquisitions for your dline and lbers vs 4-3. 

You are taking this stuff like its a madden playbook, rather than how you assemble your franchise.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is that’s not a bad thing he’s the best qb may be a little shorter then we want but he does what elite qbs do. Process quickly deliver accurately now if we surround him like it seems we want to he’ll go out and look like he does at bama we should have a top notch qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...