Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson Pro Day


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Did Will Levis have such a markedly better cast around him? He managed to complete 65% and I don’t see anybody banging the Levis drum. Maybe AR doesn’t throw a very catchable ball.

Will Levis threw a lot of screens from what I watched. I don't know if someone wants to find their passing charts for last year, but I would be Will's depth of through was much shorter. Also, Will Levis has played for multiple years in the college. In his first two years he had a 59% and 60% completion percentage, and then improved.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cam didn't need much around him at the NFL level either. Cam is a different breed. 

Our record during the Newton years would suggest otherwise.

Every quarterback needs a strong supporting cast. Newton was no exception. Neither is Richardson.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jmac said:

I don't know if you throw dice with the #1 pick and hope it rolls your way.

I don’t believe it would be rolling the dice in him: this is just one example, but he has all the traits to be elite. His situation in Florida wasn’t the best, with our coaching staff, this kid will be special. Again, I dont think we take him, but there is a solid argument to. Great twitter thread on how good he can/will be at the pro level. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I don’t believe it would be rolling the dice in him: this is just one example, but he has all the traits to be elite. His situation in Florida wasn’t the best, with our coaching staff, this kid will be special. Again, I dont think we take him, but there is a solid argument to. Great twitter thread on how good he can/will be at the pro level. 

 

One throw in a year full of bad ones does not make him ready. Okay, he did there, but can he do it consistently, that's what matters.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Will Levis threw a lot of screens from what I watched. I don't know if someone wants to find their passing charts for last year, but I would be Will's depth of through was much shorter. Also, Will Levis has played for multiple years in the college. In his first two years he had a 59% and 60% completion percentage, and then improved.

Something I came across on twitter (@Statsowar)

 

WLchart.jpeg

ARchart.jpeg

Edited by Steelo Senpai
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

My question is why are you comparing him to Cam?

 

Cam didn't need much around him at the NFL level either. Cam is a different breed. 

Idk what you want from me, you aren’t reading my posts. Yes, Cam is a different breed, that is the whole point. We are drafting #1 overall, not #9, we should be looking for a different breed type guy. Young has “it”, Stroud has been so good he’s hard to overlook. I don’t think Richardson has “it”, or at least he hasn’t shown it if he does, he’s got more questions, and WAY worse tape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

One throw in a year full of bad ones does not make him ready. Okay, he did there, but can he do it consistently, that's what matters.

That thread wasn’t just one throw, he cites and shows other examples. Dan Orlovsky has done the same thing on his twitter. Every qb has bad throws, ARs get magnified. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Isn't this coaching staff, with their centuries of experience, the right staff to develop Richardson?

It doesn't sound like they are interested in drafting someone they can't start right away. They are priming this team to win now.

If they draft him, the goal will be to start him day 1. Dalton is there in case he's not ready, but I think they won't be wanting to let him sit a year. They'd come up with an offense built around what he can and can't do right now and develop him as they go, adding things to the offense as he progresses.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...